Quote:


ARe you really that dumb. The description was given in her first interview BEFORE jack was arrested. So what youre saying is ...she woke up, turned around and saw his face, and RECOGNIZED him as Jack Venice the porn whore, and then remembered that he had these tattoos. I would say that you guys are really grasping at straws to defend a conviceted rapist. But Jack says he was NOT THERE. So out of the blue, without seeing him(he says he wasnt there) she was able to describe his tattoos BEFORE they even had a suspect. You guys are a laugh riot.

JACK IS A CONVICTED RAPIST. IT WAS PROVED IN COURT BEYOND A RASONABLE DOUBT. NOTHING YOU SAY HERE IS EVEN CLOSE TO BEING REASONABLE. GET OVER IT. THE GUY WAS FOUND GUILY BECAUSE HE IS INDEED GUILTY.

mAYBE O.J. DIT IT. tHAT IS ABOUT AS REASONABLE AS ANYTHING YOU RAPIST SUPPORTERS HAVE SAID HERE.

Or like i said before do you support jack because you have something in common?



No, it only proves his story was bullshit. If he was wearing shorts, and this was summertime, she would have seen the tattoo even if he was only laying next to her. You would have thought that they would have found some physical evidence he was actually in that bed. Things that make you go hmmm.....