Mike south has been insinuating that he has some secret informiation that will lead to all charges against Kayden Kross being dismissed. It is not true. Kayden is completely cooperating with the authorities as part of a deal to have the charges against her dropped. Mike, you know as well as anyone that the dismissal she is facing is not because she is innocent but because she is guilty and has the information needed to nail those who were higher up the food chain. Thats some good spin youre putting out there Mike, youre earning your money on this one, but like most PR people, you are full of shit.

Source? Proof? Come on....

The deal is dismissal of charges for her testimony. If the jury convicts, so be it. The 'deal' is not for a conviction, but for her truthful testimony. Kayden was the 'bottom' rung in this ladder. Restitution will come form those higher up the chain. There is also the possibility that she will be charged with one count of wire fraud(she is not currently charged with this). And to clear up one og=ther point of contention...some are saying she is federally charged....they are state 'felony' charges.

Dippy, do you understand the risk that the prosecution would take if they dismissed charges against her, she took the stand, and then became a hostile witness, or had a "lapse of memory"?


The prosecution is not taking any risk. If (Kayden) renigs on the deal, or has a lapse of memory they are free to refile the charges. That is also why the "wire fraud" charge is being bought. She pleads guilty to that. If she commits perjury on the stand, or becomes hostile, she has broken the plea deal and the files get reinstated. As part of the guilty plea on the lesser counts she also allocutes to all the other crimes she participated in or knew about. This is under oath.
Thats how plea deals in exchange for testimony work. The deal is in exchange for truthful testimony, a conviction can never be guaranteed.

Instead look what the prosecution did in the Las Vagas O.J. Simpson trial. Secure a guilty plea, with an agreed upon recommendation for a lesser sentence, or for lienency (sp) at a sentencing that occurs AFTER the trial of the "bigger fish".

---

Exactly,...that is why the lesser "wire fraud' charges are being discussed. No deal has been finalized as of yet. There is no grudge here, just pointing out some facts about a person in the adult industry on an adult industry message board. Why is there always a need for people to try to ascribe some sinister motives to every word someone writes on these boards. I was just pointing out the "spin" that 'advisor' Mike South was trying to put on the upcoming 'dismissal' of charges against "kayden."

But the sentence recieved by the person making the deal is not dependant on the conviction of those she testifies against, but on her honoring the deal to testify truthfully.

It might also be noted that other defendants in this case are facing similar charges in serveral unrelated cases of similar nature. These guys wer professional con men, and the blonde bombsell was part of their scheme. Kayden was not the only 'faceplate'(old con man term) in their scams.

Personally i think she's toast

When porn stars are on trial or part of a trial they end up being the catchers mitt for what people on the outside consdier perverted lifestyles. After that it's not that long of a run to use a porn stars history agaisnt him or her regardless if they are working for the defence or the prosecution.

Now i don't know the details of the whole thing, but you take a porn star, put in what so far seems a Veteran's family getting hosed, the housing and finicial crisis and it's likely you'll have a guilty verdict.

If i was the prosecutor i wouldnt offfer a deal, she would be the clinker that got them yanked off to a Federal Penn somewhere.

Probably, once she gets her ass in jail her 'cuteness' isnt going to help her. She'll end up being owned by some 400 pound monstrosity callled "large marge"

I hope Kayden goes away for a long time.

Easy big man, he hates women

Anyone got a link to her charges and despicable deeds ?

<<One of many many articles on her charges>>

Thanks Fman !