As an enthusiastic, veteran porn consumer I am of the opinion that the over emphasis on anal is unnecessary and is, I think, doing more damage than good. I may be wrong, but from what I've heard it's not tears of regret and pleas from Mom & dad that accounts for the high porn girl turnover rate so much as torn, reamed, useless lower bowels that result from the inncessant anal porn paradigm. Porn girls' gaping sphincters have, for some unGodly reason, replaced the cumshot as the money shot. But every smart porn consumer knows that this biologically damaging over-emphasis on anal is completely unnecessary. There are so many (and more appealing) ways to sexual degrade and humiliate a whore by abusing her face and pussy that it makes all these anal endings seem unimaginative, boring, and downright self-destructive. I'm not anti-anal by any means, but as far as I'm concerned you could shove twenty cocks up a porn girl's ass and it would pale in comparison to turning her head UPSIDEDOWN and fucking her face or pounding her pussy doggy-style from behind REALLY HARD. Max Hardcore could make a Martini (shaken, not stirred) in a porn girl's speculumed ass and make her drink it for all I care, but it just doesn't do anything for me. I know I can't be alone. Are blown out sphincters really that important to the average porn consumer? I say that anal isn't a pre-requisite to good porn as the current climate suggests. There are far more erotic possibilities abusing whores' snathches and heads, and these possibilities won't send them packing for home wearing Depends.