Quote:


He won this election without them. He and his "organization", which he will try to keep in place, are a valuable election asset which many House members will want to tap into. And, the main concern of almost all politicians is to get re-elected. He's already got a nice fresh carrot for the "donkeys" to lust after.






Clarify for me Fatman do you mean he won without the help of the liberals in Congress or liberals period?

If you mean the latter then I have to disagree. He has been on the cover of RS three times in the last seven months which is three more times than any Republican has been on their cover without a noose drawn around their neck in the last decade. The editorial staff at the NYT has had their nose so far up his ass they can tell you what Bill Ayers served for dinner in 1996. The non-Fox network cheerleaders did everything but perform backflips out of a pyramid formation on national television for him. Time, Newsweek, and the majority of the big market newspapers put far more emphasis on Troopergate, bridges to nowhere, and Alaskan successionists than they did on Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers. He even got the blessing of Oprah. With all this he didn't need any help from the liberals in Congress. Oprah, Bill Maher, Jon Stewart, and Stephen Colbert are better at making a case for Obama on television or in public than Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, and Bernie Sanders are anyway.
_________________________
I would eat Allie Sin's asshole until I got an emotion out of her.-Jerkules