He is the first male performer where his "gonzo" porn acting just way too closely reflected the real crime.

I think it was the stupidest move for companies in the last year to knowingly releases scenes with him in them. Why not wait eight months and see what happens? Is a $1500 scene that much to risk possible litigation?

I don't even know where to start...its just a weird legal grey area with California Law, Washington Law, all sorts of weird legislation when it comes to sex offenders (which Jack is, and god knows if that becomes retroactive back to the date of the rape), all sorts of weird OSHA rules when it comes to workplace safety (knowingly employing someone accused of rape on a sex set). Its not as if Jack's situation was some big fucking secret.

Hell, or the victim could sue anyone from LA Direct to any film released with him in the last year and argue that the companies tried to profit from his name and publicity at her expense.

I think that Jacks conviction will be the first of many dominoes to fall over this. Are companies going to try and still rehire him once he gets out of prison?