Quote:

---

Jack Venice is a male performer who entered the business about 3 years ago under contract with Extreme Associates, not long after he left the military. He is a fellow Texan like myself, and after his contract finished, he quickly joined the male performer stable at LA Direct Models.

What happened next is a tragedy for Jack, for our business, and most importantly for the girl in question.

In the year that Jack was free on bond, he still performed in some scenes for various companies. My question is whether or not those companies pull those scenes. If a girl sued a company that used him knowing he was an accused rapist, can the girl he worked with sue that company for having her work with a convicted rapist?

---

As recently as two weeks ago LA Direct Models (who you and Jack were both repped by) still had Jack listed on their site under male models...and had his availability listed until September 27th. When I checked their site today he was not listed under the main page, but a little internet sleuthing brought his page up:
http://www.ladirectmodels.com/view.php?id=147&gender=male

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM...


Why not ask whether LA Direct can possibly be legally linked ,considering, I imagine, they still collected a fee when they got him work?

I'm wondering if you had any insight into why they (or Derek I guess) continued to keep Jack on their roster, especially considering all the rumors that have swirled around LA Direct and some sort of FBI attention. I really doubt having an actor soon to be convicted or rape still working that recently was a good decision.

Wondering.