Well, if there's no nudity, and they all have parental consent, then I don't really see there being much of a case.

Are the children being exploited? Absolutely, but anyone who owns a pair of sneakers or sportswear can hardly get on their high horse about child exploitation.

Is it 'creepy'? Again, yes...but then so is Anne Geddes stuff if you ask me, and that's about as mainstream as you can get. I've no doubt that the FBI woud love to get their hands on the memberlist for a site like this, simply because it is probably made up of the same creepy fucks who attend/promote these child beauty paegents and it would be an invaluable reference when the next 'JonBenet' case rolls around.

I was fortunate enough to be present at a lecture from a titled member of the aristocracy who also practices law over here, and there is one line that has stuck with me ever since: 'There is what is right, there is what is just, there is what is proper, fair, and moral...and then there is what is legal'.

Even though there is no nudity or sexual content on this site, it's a fair bet that someone is sat at home jerking/jilling off to it. But that doesn't make it illegal. Should we ban Power Rangers or High School Musical because someone knocked one off the wrist while looking at it? And if yes, where do we stop?

Whilst it's not my cup of tea, I see very little grounds to ban it...nobody is going to see anything they wouldn't see if they went to one of these paegents or to the beach or whatever other paedo hotspot. Indeed, it would appear to me that any offence or obscenity is purely in your own mind...it's like this 'Childsupermodel' site is a giant Rorschach test, and you failed it.