Jim, you of al people here certainly must see the what I am trying to get at here. Of course anyone accused of a crime has the right to counsel. But, as pornlaw stated, an attorney is not required to take a case.

When Sirkin took this case the line between adult content and content containing the sexual exploitaion of children is blurred, if not comppletely erased. The same high profile lawyer defending the content of max and stagliano is saying that content with children should be protected in the same way. It is just not good for the adult industry to have our most famous attorney argue to the courts and to the public that content with children is no different than content with adults.

How can anyone in this biz say that they oppose the exploitation of children, when the top industry lawyer says this content should be protected. It just doesnt pass the smell test. You are either for this or against it. There is no middle ground.

Of course they have the right to counsel. Mr. Sirkin should have used better judgement and disct