Or you could have just Linked to the DOJ press release. They don't state which statutes were violated, either.

While the Third Circuit has ruled that depictions clothed children violate federal law if they constitute "lascivious exhibitions of the genitalia or pubic area," the question is whether or not the Webe Web pictures are "lascivious."

Sounds to me this is exactly the kind of case a First Amendment lawyer should be taking.

I also find it funny as fuck that the Webe Web case inspired legislation banning child modeling web sites from that noted protector of children, Mark Foley.