Quote:

Well, you PMed me. It would be rude to leave you hanging. (Not that I've never been rude on this board.)

I do think you're making too much of this, though. No judge is going to allow the Government to make the inference to a jury that because one of Sirkin's clients was an alleged Child Pornographer that they're all Child Pornographers. That would practically guarantee reversal.




I AGREE....But I think the real damage will be done in the 'court of public opinion." Right or wrong, the ammunition that this gives that anti-porn whackos cant be denied.

It makes the adult industy's battle to be SEPERATED form CP that much more difficult. When the same lawyer who defends MaxHardocre's content, or staglianos content, turns around and defends the content of Childsupermodels........It just aint right.