Jim,
I was merely using the related topic of Mr. Barbellas arrest on child porn charges to bring to light the fact that Mr. Sirkin is defending someone accused of the sexual expoitation of children.. Yes everyone has the right to an attorney, but I find it appalling that one of the best known ADULT industry attorneys would CHOOSE to take a case defending someone who sexually expoits children.

I think Mr. Sirkin should have done the same thing 'pornlaw' did, and refuse to take the case.

I am merely asking the question, do you think it is good for the adult industry to have one of its most famous attorneys defending someone charged with the sexual exloitaion of childreN? And if you've ever seen these sites there is NO DOUBT that these childre(7,8,9 years old) are being sexually expoited for PROFIT.