Quote:

Is it just me, or do nearly all of the 18yr old girls in porn (soft and hard) look like they're aged 20+ ? Even sites or magazines promising 'barely legal' teens give us girls who could be in their early 20s.

I know that most 18 yr olds could probably pass for being 20, but surely there are lots of short, slightly built 18 year olds who don't look any older than their age. So where are they all ? Or do porn makers all follow the unwritten rule that you can show an 18 yr old naked, but only if she can pass for being 20 ?

Personally, if a site, magazine or DVD says it features 18 yr old girls, I want to see girls who LOOK like they're only 18, not ones who could be 19, 20 or even older.



You're assuming way too much about how the titles featuring these girls are developed. Very little thought goes into it - companies have their existing "lines" that exploit a gimmick, i.e. "Barely 18 Eighteen Year Old Teens", "MILF Mommy Moms", "Lusty Latin Latinas" etc.

Next you have an endless parade of female performers coming from the agencies shooting for their lines - what title they end up in isn't always calculated up front. They just kind of get thrown loosely into whatever 'gimmick' line seems most appropriate.

So, the occasional 31 year old girl ending up in a "teen" movie, or conversely a 20 or 21 year old with a lot of hard miles that ends up in the occasional MILF movie, or even hispanic girls in black and asian themed, asian girls in hispanic themed movies - you name it - there's no truth in advertising.

A bunch of girls are simply booked on a particular day or multiple days (sometimes a title will take many months to accumulate enough scenes), its edited and a label is slapped on, and out the door to distributors it goes.

In the end I'm not sure why titles or genres matter except as a ballpark way of finding your interests.