Quote:

Dippy wrote:

"A dog being used in a MAINSTREAM film has more health and safety protection that does a porn performer."


That has more to do with the (fucked up) way society treats and looks at animals than with the porn industry.
Animals are more human than human.....

lol @ tampon



I agree. I guess thats why we now have 'animal rights activists.' But it is even funnier that NOBODY in the porn biz even cares about the health and safety issue,(or should i say non-issue,), and this has been proven over the years by the comlete lack of any type of protection whatsoever. The monthly HIV test is not for the performers, but a way for the producers to have some sort of deniability regarding HIV on their sets. All the other stuff is just conveniantly IGNORED. Any performer who thinks an HIV test is 'required' for HEALTH reasons is simply wrong. It is to provide protection for the producer. If there was no possible financial penalty for HIV being transmitted on a set then the producers would not care one way or another if the talent was tested. Only in porn.