I read it a little yesterday, what did you feel where the major points? I read something about wanting to have the URLs cross references with the ID info for everyplace an image appears. That's not going to happen, it just seems impossible. I read something about distinctions it makes between a primary and secondary producer, which is interesting too, like they'd want a duplicator to keep records? It all seems stupid and has nothing to do with stopping child pornography, it just has to do with making the life of pornographers more difficult.

Has anyone intelligent analyzed the proposed changes and broken them down anywhere yet?

Hopefully this will be Ashcroft's farewell gift to us when we kick him out of office in November. Well, hopefully it will fail or be changed. It is open for public comment. Follow the instructions in the proposal and send them your comments.

Malice