New chick who came in to do porn yesterday. Just looking for thoughts and opinions on her and the pics I took. No photochop, though unfortunately no anal either...

Not bad. I'd like to see her waist w/out the corset, though. Pretty face, but tell her to calm down on the eyebrows a bit. They look a tad too chula-transtastic.

No anal? Will she last?

she is the lovechild of shannen doherty and michelle trachtenburg. in a good way!

Hard to give an opinion when there is nothing shown to give an opinion about.
Her face is nice but her body is covered and posed in a way to make it near impossible to draw an informed conclusion so no critique is possible other then "these pictures suck".

she's got armpit fat. or it could be the corset. and shouldn't she have more of an appearance of a waist since she IS wearing a fucken corset? and gia's right about the eyebrows. she's one twenty rock away from a sharpee.

I'd say you're a better photographer than a talent scout.

Thanks guys. Always good to hear input.
Gia here is a couple without the corset. These were just a first shoot kinda deal to get her acquainted, and see how she is in front of the camera. As for the eyebrows, I'll bring it up... after our first shoot.

Two thumbs up, nice looking lady!

Watch your background-- especially the space around her head. You don't want anything competing with her face. You might want to try shooting a little further away from the background, and/or using a shallower depth of field (i.e. lower f/stop).

It's hot when you talk shop, baby.

Thanks very much for the constructive critiques Holly. I'll remember those tips for next time. I'm starting to really enjoy taking pics.
Might have to pick a fixed focus lens so I can get that shallow depth of field.

Sorry but maybe I misunderstood, are you asking to critique the girl or the photo composition?

My opinion of the girl (with the additional photos provided, thank you very much) is she looks a little soft for my personal tastes but I wouldn't hesitate to book her for a shoot, anal or no.

Just keep her out of tight clothes that would cause fat rolls.

Nice girl. But yea, the background is distracting.

IMO, she is a babe.

Is there make-up to cover up those tatts for shoots?

Here's a shot from today with the depth of field sorted on the same set. Though it was shot on a full frame camera vice the camera that was used the other day. (Canon 5D - Sony A-100) I'll get the hang of this shit eventually. (Not my pic BTW)

Lance, can we also get a pic of the girl on the right? She seems to have bigger tits

Also, hand higher on the waist to cover her fat roll.
Either that or don't have her twist too much.

I am not much of a photographer, I do mostly nature stuff anyway, but I would echo Holly's sentiments regarding those diamond wall hangers... especially because they are the same color as the subject's hair. They blend together way too much.

Very pretty girl though.

She has a very pretty face and her body is nice too, I just think that pose wasnt so good for her body type, but she's very pretty.

Thanks for all the input everyone. Who'da thunk I'd get something constructive outta this place?

dont go overboard with adjusting the exposure, the last shot made my eyes bleed.


and although the feedback on choice of backgrounds does hold its own in the porn court, please do not steer yourself in any specific direction based on boring, xxx standards for shooting porn...composition albeit important..shouldnt be something your constantly freaking over when shooting...

just my opinion