[quot




Soon the right of a woman to an abortion might be lost.

If I wanted to be married to two women, I couldn't be. Though, if I wanted to impregnate several and live separately ... well, that's OK.


Certainly unchecked there would be far more problems. This calls for vigilance and active preemption.

I believe that my right to freedom of speech, or anyone else's, should NOT be the province of the tyranny of the majority.


I don't believe in providing food aid to countries who are not controlling their populations. I don't believe in providing military aid to dictatorships.


I would describe my pursuit of freedom as Libertarian since neither the right nor the left is immune to attempting to censor.



Jim, you make some very valid points whith which i wholeheartedly agree. But I do find one major inconsistatntcy in your argument.

You speak about abortion, marriage and children and how you fear the intrusion of the right wing when it comes to your personal choice regarding these matters. These are the most basic of fundamental human rights and NOBODY has the right to interfere with theses choices. I think we agree on that.


But next you say..."I dont believe in providing food aid to countries WHO ARE NOT CONTROLLING THEIR POPULATIONS."

While you worry about a womans right to seek an abortion, you at the sasme time SEEM to advocate that OTHER governments control the very rights that you and I hold so dear in this country, and will kill or die to defend.



Then you describe yourself as LIBERTARIAN To deny people the right to have children is is the grossest human rights violation there is.


How can you possibly reconcile those two positions. You cant tell the U.S. government to stay out of your bedroom, and at the same time INSIST that other governments do exactly that before they recieve your money.

Or is it that your true position is more like, I want everyhing i want and i deserve evverything I want, and to hell with everyone else because I want it.