Here are six questions for everyone who has posted (or who will post) in this thread (hint, you don't need to be a lawyer to answer any of these questions, just use common sense):

Q1: If you had been one of the jurors at Max Hardcore's trial and you decided to vote "Not Guilty" on each and every charge, could any of the other jurors FORCE you to change your vote to "Guilty" on any of the charges?

Q2: If you remained steadfast in your position, and no matter how long jury deliberations dragged on, could the judge fine or imprison you or in any other way punish you?

Q3: Are you under any legal obligation to reach a consensus of opinion with the other jurors?

Q4: Do you bear any legal obligation to follow the judge's instructions on how to apply the law?

Q5: If, as one of the jurors at Max Hardcore's trial, you voted "Not Guilty" on each and every charge, what would have been the outcome of that trial?

Q6: What is the supreme law of the land?

If you are unsure of the answers to any of the above questions, please read my first post in this thread in its entirety.