Quote:

Well, I've now heard everything. The phrase "artistic message" was used in describing the puke-fest, woman-hating crap that is found in a Paul Little video. And then, in a move that should have drawn a world-class bitch slap, one of Little's scum-sucking attorneys actually had the balls to mention Lenny Bruce (comic genius) and Paul Little (dude who has to dress women up as little girls to manage a 3-inch hardon) in the same sentence. Sad, just sad.

For those of you wraping yourself in first-amendment outrage at this trial, remember that obscenity is NOT protected by the first amendment. That has already been decided by the SC. You have to prove that the material has artistic merit in order to get that protection and cmon, not even Eminence Front could muster that argument with a straight face (although maybe with a hard dick). Actually, most porn wouldn't pass that test but luckily, most porn doesn't get challenged in court. There must be limits folks, like yelling fire in a crowded theatre. I believe what this guy does is well beyond that limit and just cannot be allowed, else it taints all other porn by association.



Dear asswipe, it's not about the content involved as it is so much about the freedoms WE in the country are being denied on a monthly basis.

Responsible adults can watch this is they please.
Responsible adults may participate in this if they please.

What part of the above do you not understand, oh Christian crusader? Fuck "art", it's about your right to produce or view something. As long as it's not killing or maiming someone, keep the moralistic bullshit opins out of it.

You may return to your normal 'fucking thyself' duties. Thanks.

Quote:

BTW: Does anyone else think max looks a little like Tommy Lasorda in that suit?

[image]

I was hoping he'd wear his trademark hat.
_________________________
Because you already yelled 'dropping prices!!!' after Red Light canned you. - Gia Jordan to Brandon Iron