19072 Members
14 Forums
40341 Topics
614113 Posts
Max Online: 911 @ 01/26/25 02:49 PM
|
|
|
#318697 - 04/23/08 10:15 PM
Re: Who's avoiding Evil Angel?
|
Internet Tough Guy
Registered: 01/27/07
Posts: 775
Loc: Snottsdale, Arizona
|
Isn't squirting, in fact, just obscene urination? We have whole movies now of girls peeing on other girls and men and everyone drinking it like it is refreshing orange juice. When the justice department brings in doctors to prove that squirting is pee, someone is in big trouble. If EA can prove squirting is quarts of orgasm juice, then they will win.
Is enema pooping also obscene?
_________________________
I love cock and balls.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#318698 - 04/23/08 10:20 PM
Re: Who's avoiding Evil Angel?
|
Rob Black's Crack Pipe
Registered: 04/22/08
Posts: 88
Loc: Depends on mood.
|
Quote:
I am aware that a lot of stores have pulled the two movies in question (and some have pulled the movie of the trailer involved also). Some stores are pulling ALL squirting movies, regardless of whether they're from Evil Angel or any other company.
As far as whole business dealings with us go being affected, it remains to be seen, I guess. So far, other than those two movies, we haven't seen any backlash regarding anything other than squirting movies, and most stores only stopped selling just the two movies.
Thank you Tricia.
I have to speak somewhat candidly here…(anonymously & candidly, is that possible?)
I was at a thing recently and heard someone say, "We're not doing work with Evil until this thing blows over." I have to say, I was kind of stunned. On one hand, it makes sense (especially if you have something to hide), but on the other, I would think this is a rally cry meant to tell the govt that the adult community is unaffected.
I suppose it remains to be seen how this will pan out.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#318699 - 04/23/08 11:15 PM
Re: Who's avoiding Evil Angel?
|
Rob Black's Crack Pipe
Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 108
|
I've said before, there are two types of pornographers, those who stand up for their first amendment rights,and those who HIDE behind the first amendment.
The 'stand up' people will support mr. stag,by continuing to do buissnes with EA, and if possible,donate to the cause.
The others will 'wait and see' what happens, and when the smoke is cleared come out from their hiding places.
Everyone in the industry will benefit if and when EA is cleared, but dont look for many to put their neck on the line. How many are willing to put their neck on the line for MAX or ROB BLACK. Whether you like them or not, the ISSUE is the same, and I dont see much support at all for either of those two.
It would be interesting to know if the Stags offered any kind of support for either of these two.
A rose by any other name is still a rose. Call it what you will, but "squirting" is peeing. Period. End of conversation.
Best wishes to the Staglianos.
Illegitibus non carborundum= dont let the bastards wear you down. Good luck.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#318700 - 04/24/08 08:45 AM
Re: Who's avoiding Evil Angel?
|
Internet Tough Guy
Registered: 01/27/07
Posts: 775
Loc: Snottsdale, Arizona
|
What is Evil Angels stance on squirting? The problem with the justice department is that they are very inconsistent in enforcement. Elegant Angel and others have made squirting a household name. I can't hook up anymore without some dumb bitch peeing in my bed to impress me. And fuck you very much for that jackasses.
The laws are inconsistent. If there was a law that said, "no peeing by man or woman on film or we will throw your ass in prison", most people would not risk "squirting".
_________________________
I love cock and balls.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#318701 - 04/24/08 09:04 AM
Re: Who's avoiding Evil Angel?
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 04/14/03
Posts: 7408
Loc: JM Productions
|
Quote:
I've said before, there are two types of pornographers, those who stand up for their first amendment rights,and those who HIDE behind the first amendment.
The 'stand up' people will support mr. stag,by continuing to do buissnes with EA, and if possible,donate to the cause.
The others will 'wait and see' what happens, and when the smoke is cleared come out from their hiding places.
Everyone in the industry will benefit if and when EA is cleared, but dont look for many to put their neck on the line. How many are willing to put their neck on the line for MAX or ROB BLACK. Whether you like them or not, the ISSUE is the same, and I dont see much support at all for either of those two.
Well said. This is no business to be in if youre a poser. Its times like this that separate the men from the boys and it will become very clear to the folks at Evil Angel who the real people are and who are the spineless pussies. Me, Max and Rob have all shown our true colors and now its Johns turn. Hopefully he will be the one to finally unite this industry once and for all.
_________________________
all women should be victims of something, because they lied. - big moose
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#318702 - 04/24/08 10:04 AM
Re: Who's avoiding Evil Angel?
|
Internet Tough Guy
Registered: 07/14/06
Posts: 775
Loc: Hollywood, CA
|
Quote:
Quote:
I've said before, there are two types of pornographers, those who stand up for their first amendment rights,and those who HIDE behind the first amendment.
The 'stand up' people will support mr. stag,by continuing to do buissnes with EA, and if possible,donate to the cause.
The others will 'wait and see' what happens, and when the smoke is cleared come out from their hiding places.
Everyone in the industry will benefit if and when EA is cleared, but dont look for many to put their neck on the line. How many are willing to put their neck on the line for MAX or ROB BLACK. Whether you like them or not, the ISSUE is the same, and I dont see much support at all for either of those two.
Well said. This is no business to be in if youre a poser. Its times like this that separate the men from the boys and it will become very clear to the folks at Evil Angel who the real people are and who are the spineless pussies. Me, Max and Rob have all shown our true colors and now its Johns turn. Hopefully he will be the one to finally unite this industry once and for all.
Since you guys are really the meat and potatoes men in the genre, why don't you four be the first to get together, screw the FSC, start your own organization, think long term, something like "Extreme Artist Coalition" EAC set up a funding program headed by a trusty, put some pressure on the whores to donate too, it is after all *their* lively hood as well.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#318703 - 04/24/08 10:56 AM
Re: Who's avoiding Evil Angel?
|
Max Hardcore Prison Bitch
Registered: 07/28/06
Posts: 202
Loc: Malibu
|
We did not offer money to Max, Rob or Jeff. John donated money to Seymour Butts and to a retail store.
It wasn't about thinking that the first three deserved MORE to get their prosecutions. John and I don't like Rob, point blank. And we don't personally know Max or Jeff, and I don't think we were ever asked for money from them. Both of us publicly stated that we did not think that those directors/companies deserved to be prosecuted, and whether we liked their product or them as people had nothing to do with whether they should be allowed to make their movies or not. Believe me, it comes from a very deep down place inside of me to be able to say that I can strongly dislike someone like Rob, but that he absolutely has the right to make whatever movies he wants if they're consensual.
In the last couple of years, we were asked by one online store for money. We were over a million dollars into legal bills for our copyright case right then, and said we weren't able to help right then, but that we were open to them calling back. They never did. With Five Star DVD, we gave them better terms so that they could have more cash flow. When they went out of business, we lost a lot more money than if we hadn't loosened their terms.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
744
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|