19072 Members
14 Forums
40341 Topics
614094 Posts
Max Online: 788 @ 09/28/24 10:05 AM
|
|
|
#297279 - 01/29/08 08:38 AM
Whodunnit???
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Whichever of you mods is responsible: Thank You.
Attachments
288052-SashaBanned.jpg (18 downloads)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297280 - 01/29/08 02:26 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 4856
Loc: The 4th International
|
I agree: thanks!
_________________________
The only thing you got that I want, is your suffering.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297281 - 01/29/08 02:36 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 03/22/06
Posts: 6557
Loc: 2004 - the glory days
|
guilty
_________________________
"You are the worst poster in xpt yet I can't stop talking about you" - smelly monkey
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297282 - 01/29/08 02:39 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
King, the next time I'm in Jersey, the Guinness is on me.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297283 - 01/29/08 04:40 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 04/14/06
Posts: 14755
Loc: Busy downloading [LEGALLY!]
|
SashaMutt was annoying, but I oppose the ban.
_________________________
Amo i Gemelli!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297284 - 01/29/08 08:00 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 09/07/05
Posts: 14160
Loc: NYC
|
Mind Ltd thinks it was me since I already threatened him with a ban from his spamming with stupid links everywhere, but it's true- it was King.
Mind Ltd sent me a pm asking where is xpt's anti-spam policy. Who cares. Your bitch-ass got banned anywayz.
_________________________
"What I do know is that if Karen Carpenter and Mama Cass Elliot had shared that sandwich they'd both be alive today." -Michael K
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297285 - 01/29/08 10:26 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Pervert
Registered: 08/05/05
Posts: 2116
Loc: Faber College
|
Whatever happened to the penalty box that would appear from time to time on the upper left of the page?
_________________________
It was a wonderful community with some very enjoyable members. But the vast majority were like German housewives circa 1943 prenteding that horrib;le smell wafting through their open windowsd was just the neighbors having a cookout..--Windsock
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297286 - 01/29/08 10:28 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 09/23/04
Posts: 10321
|
Dean I don't think anyone's merited a boxing in a while. It's been all or nothing lately.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297288 - 01/30/08 05:28 AM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 08/09/06
Posts: 9113
Loc: red dirt state of mind
|
Quote:
Mind Ltd sent me a pm asking where is xpt's anti-spam policy. Who cares. Your bitch-ass got banned anywayz.
The douche bag broke the drunken k1ng policy. This is a an unwritten XPT policy by the way.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297289 - 01/30/08 06:08 AM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
The douche bag broke the drunken k1ng policy. This is a an unwritten XPT policy by the way.
Precisely. It's like Double Secret Probation.
As a rule, I oppose arbitrary banning. But Limited Mind recieved innumerable warnings: Public ones from mods like Gia and King (not to mention the complaints of regular posters,) and I'm sure she got several private chats from others. The point is: She was repeatedly warned, and instead of improving, remained obstinate in her suckage. Sorry, can't empathize.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297290 - 01/30/08 10:47 AM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 04/14/06
Posts: 14755
Loc: Busy downloading [LEGALLY!]
|
Quote:
Quote:
SashaMutt was annoying, but I oppose the ban.
Could you explain your reasons for opposing banning? Curious to find out, because I find it difficult to draw the line.
I generally oppose bans. It doesn't take much to go from banning people you don't like to being ADT.
I believe that a ban only should be instituted when a person goes WAY above and beyond. I saw this as warranting a trip to the Phlog-box perhaps, but not a ban. And, as might be noted from my posts, I don't much like SashaMutt, Ltd.
That said. Being nasty to King is just plain stupid. You have to go way out of your way to mess with King. He isn't a rash actor, doesn't have an inflated ego and doesn't involve himself in the various wars that go on here. So, I have little sympathy for the ban since I have a high opinion of King.
Still, I can't bring myself to fully support it. Nor am I going to lead a letter writing campaign to bring her back.
BUT, it would have been funny to see SashaMutt in the box!
Bottomline, I rather tool on her than silence her.
_________________________
Amo i Gemelli!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297292 - 01/30/08 11:37 AM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 04/14/06
Posts: 14755
Loc: Busy downloading [LEGALLY!]
|
See, this is where I'm very inconsistent.
I fully support Mr. Sparkle's ban. I just could not abide that broken english schtick.
_________________________
Amo i Gemelli!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297293 - 01/30/08 01:19 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 4856
Loc: The 4th International
|
Inconsistent is the word, Fatman. I can live with the ban on Mr. Sparkle, but even then. Except for being very annoying, where did he go wrong?
As long as a ban is not a one-man (or woman) decision, I trust the wisdom of the moderators as a collective. Thank you all for your explanation.
_________________________
The only thing you got that I want, is your suffering.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297295 - 01/30/08 07:22 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Human Garbage
Registered: 05/08/07
Posts: 1681
|
If someone sucks, then they suck. They shouldn't be banned for that. If they suck purposefully, ban 'em. If their only contribution to the board is a one-sided video dialogue that leeches the bandwith of a small Canadian town, ban 'em.
I've spent all of 13 seconds lamenting this fuckhead's ban and have since moved on. It feels great.
_________________________
There's not a woman alive who has not wanted to be treated like a whore. It's in their genes.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#297298 - 01/30/08 08:22 PM
Re: Whodunnit???
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
While a real person has no obligation to be funny and entertaining, a character or hate-bot does.
And that's just it: I can think of several different ways he could have taken the Mr. Sparkle character, each of them funny. Sadly, Frankie took none of those routes.
Worse, by far, was the Lockwoodian post count. It's one thing to try out a character and have it suck. It's an altogether different thing to do so while beating folks over the head with a sledgehammer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
335
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|