Quote:

---

What good is a porn review site without pictures? I know the Tyrannic Duo are trying to sell ADT; she admitted so much. But why does anyone want to read a bunch of porno reviews with no visual depictions of the action? Men are visually-oriented animals anyway, when was the last time a man been caught reading a Harlequin romance novel? I realize they banned the pictures because they are too cheap to insure themselves against the risk. That's not good enbough for me. I'm overthinking this, but when I read how much bojo-One enjoyed wacking to a scene of rug-chewers Aaralyn Barra and Cindy Crawford, I don't get a picture of two whores in a 69--I get a picture of a middle-aged Safeway employee alone at 4:42 a.m. in a dark apartment with one hand on the remote...and...ermmm

XPT --> <-- ADT

---

Good point Willie, a porn review site without pix is like a porn review mag with just ads & words. Totally worthless & nobody would buy it, plus most reviewers aren't talented enough with their words to evoke anything in the imagination close to what photo can do. Thankfully @ XPT if you hate my reviews you can at least peep the pix and decide for yourself.