Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I'm posting these things because I'm trying to get a better read on Luke than lot of the hyperbole that is out there about him.

When it comes to porn it seems clear that he is incredibly biased and yet he chastises the MSM for not doing it's job? Now I hope Luke reads this and understand that it isn't a personal attack but more in the lines of an ongoing curiosity about the divergence in his outlook on journalism. Can you be anti-porn and report on it in an unbiased (hidden or not) manner?




Why would anyone want to report anything in an unbiased manner? That would be hypocritical, in addition to being boring. Also, I thought unbiased reporting was the sole domain of News Corp. - "Fair and Balanced" TM





So if im reading this correctly by being hyprocritical we come closer to the truth?

Deep.





I don't think so. I say that pretending to be reporting "the" truth in an unbiased manner is an act of hypocrisy. Why? Because the truth is very expensive to come by, and a one man outfit who "needs to maximize its returns" (as Luke Ford put it himself once) doesn't have the resources to do so. So it's more honest to drop that pretense from the get go. Even the "news" rooms at major broadcasters have no resources to investigate and research "the truth".

"The truth" is the domain of religion, corporate intelligence units and governments. Not to bore you with clichés, you know the iconic inscription in the lobby of the Original Headquarters Building of the CIA:

"And Ye Shall Know the Truth and the Truth Shall Make You Free" - John 8:32

Still, sometimes there is more truth and integrity to be found in a little bit of porn gossip then on the front pages of national newspapers.