I've never met the man , but I think I can say with a reasonable amount of accuracy that Luke for what its worth doesn't look at himself as a dipshit.I've followed his website over the years, even before he sold it and its almost as though he has this fascination with Porn and the people in it.

He's described himself as as not a conventional journalist, not a businessman, but more of an entertainer.I'm curious though as though he has an ongoing discussion on his other blog about the ongoing failures of journalism. currently he seems to be railing at some situation where an Anchorwoman was having a relationship with the Mayor of Los Angeles and why the mainstream media isn't camping outside her door looking for whatever it is that reporters look for.

Maybe I'm starry-eyed but shouldn't he be practicing professionally what he wishes other would?. He's a constant negative influence on the Adult Business, for the simple reason that when Luke speaks to someone of shall we say - more conservative viewpoints he finds a receptive audience.
To my own clearly limited eyes it was my impression that reporters and news instruments where to show non-bias in their reporting, gather the facts relevant to a situation and let the viewer decide.


But how does this jibe with his self description of an 'entertainer'. Call me provincial but since when do entertainers other than Tom Cruise et al complain about the media? and especially when most of the complaints about the Adult business consist a long series of blanket statements to the effect that Porn is probably worse for you than sucking on an exhaust pipe?

Just wonderin'