I read Luke's site regularly but I skip any interviews with porn girls, especially the new crop. Its not that Luke doesn't dig up juicy facts, ask the tough questions or act like such a quiet inept retard he forces the subject to spill their guts out of boredom and pity.

How interesting of an interview can you get out of whores who are just boring people to begin with and what type of questions do you ask to get a response that doesn't end with a sad molestation or abortion story?

Or take this story: Luke a few months ago interviews a girl on-set new to the business. She goes to my old college. He asks what type of response she gets from students and she claims she's rarely bothered and the response is nominal.

The truth? Its been a topic of conversation all over campus and all over tons of message boards. The girl even gets caught editing details in her own Wikipedia entry (like where she goes to school after blurting it out in some scene she starred in). Her boyfriend threatens to sue a few message boards. Tons of other juicy details and events. Very interesting story which raises issues of online privacy, wiki-ing, and the balance between being a college student and advertising and promoting your own porn career. Yet Lurk posts some myspace blog entry he found like some old creep.

So yeah, even when there's an interesting story girls will just lie about it anyway. Just skip the interviews with the girls Luke, stick to the shit stirring like the current Chico Wang fiasco.