Quote:

Quote:

I wanted to ask Shane why Matt Zane punked out on sending me the Witches Sabbath.





Co-sign...I too have yet to receive my promised screener, and believe it or not I would have given it an absolutely unbiased review as well.

However, in the fullness of time, I have come to realise that guys jizzing over a bust of Jesus is totally . I don't care about the religious implications...if you want to do something like that, use a bust of the Virgin Mary. She, at least, is a chick. Jesus is a dude. A bust of Jesus is an artificial approximation of a male's face, just like those dildos and strap-ons that Kurt Lockwood takes up his ass when he is being comfortable with his sexuality are artificial approximations of a male's genitals, thus it's .

Fact: If a guy that busts a nut on another guy's face, it's . Therefore, if a guy busts a nut on a sculpture of a guy's face, it is, by extension, . And that goes double for Lockwood getting artificial cocks jammed up his butthole.

Truth be told, Smut, I think you and I have thankfully dodged the bullet on this one...




Yeah, I concur, the rationale above was perhaps more blasphemous than the flick itself. I almost didn't want a copy, but I got enough hype e-mails in the bulk folder to make me wonder where the fuck is the screener? I'll be the judgment day of how blasphemous the fucking thing is. No reasponse from Matt "the Lord" Zane.
_________________________
"I only insult those who deserve it." - Alfred E. Neuman