Quote:
Quote:
Max's work as has been described by others here looks like a textbook example of material that will fail the Miller v. California Test. 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
And yet, LA City prosecutors failed to get a conviction against Max on exactly that basis. Source
I think Paperchase is correct in that the DOJ has found some of the most vile material to try and make new precedent with and then that precedent will be used against the others. Its going to end on appeal in 5-10 years with John Roberts, Scalia and Clarence Thomas (heh heh) watching Max Hardcore piss in some girls mouth. That material may persuade even the most liberal members of the court to affirm an obscenity conviction, rather than say "its consenting adults making filth for consenting adults."
People have warned the adult community to censor itself before the government did. No one listened and now when the next generation of obscenity law comes down, it will be based on Max Hardcore films.
_________________________
"This thing is ready to do damage!"
Previous Topic
Index
