Quote:

---

It was probably due to the Obscenity case against the Sweet Entertainment Group a while back. I don't believe it had anything to do with 2257. Which incidentally they won and all but obliterated any hope of an obscenity prosecution in BC let alone Canada.

---

The Sweet case was dismissed on the basis that the material confiscated was not radically different from other material widely available to Canadian consumers, and as a result the Judge was satisfied that "Canadians, for better or worse, tolerate other Canadians viewing sexually explicit activity coupled with graphic violence..."

source (check last page)

We're not all deviants, but we tolerate them.