Quote:


So what, the Marcus board represents all IR fans? I visit there once every blue moon but personally I find the browsing too slow to make it a frequent destination.



Does Gia's on-camera sex acts and/or persona accurately represent her entire outlook on life enough for you to be able to jump to a conclusion on it?

Quote:

A good deal of the porn I own was purchased, not pirated. But I will admit to using the net sometimes to "preview" movies that I am interested in.



Most DVDs and websites have "previews"...they're called "trailers". Downloading copyrighted material without the copyright holder's permission is called "piracy". It's like when you "preview" a car from an auto dealership, it's called a "test drive", but when you "preview" a car without the car owner's permission, it's called "Grand Theft Auto".

Quote:


I agree with this, but I don't think Gia was holding out for anything. She just didn't want to be partnered with a black guy ... for whatever reason.



More importantly, you don't know either...it's just your opinion, not a fact. What you're doing is a classic case of what's called 'mind reading', i.e. ascribing motives to someone based not on what they think (or believe), but instead upon what you think they think, or what you believe they believe.


Quote:


No. Again, I am not some guy that considers IR as part of an increasing scale of "nastiness". Being a black guy I just enjoy knowing that starlets I watch don't mind being with black guys. Its really that simple.




Here I agree with you...I don't think IR is 'nastier', and the colour of a dick shouldn't make a difference, but the fact is that it does. If girls can charge extra for it, they will (and they should, IMHO)...that's not racism, it's commercialism and/or capitalism. Should it make any difference fee-wise if the dick goes (solely) in the ass instead of the vagina? Maybe, maybe not, but again the fact is that it does. Should it make a difference if the cock in the scene is attached to a tranny (who, let's face it, are mostly guys with bolt-ons)? Objectively, no...but again, it does make a difference.

I can see where you're coming from to an extent, but I'm English, and plenty of my favourite porn girls have never done an English dick on film (Hell, some, if you count the JAV girls, have never even done a Caucasian ) but this doesn't detract from my enjoyment of their movies in the slightest.

Quote:


C'mon Dan. Once again you pick inappropriate examples to make your point. You know good and well that refusing to do guys at all OR not wanting to do transexuals is a completely different level of personal choice.

If an actress doesn't want to do B/G common sense tells you that its not because she "hates guys". Its either because she is in a relationship and wants to follow certain rules or that doing B/G will put her into another tier of sex worker that she doesn't want to be associated with.



Meaning that she looks down on performing sex with men on camera...I don't think being prejudiced against an entire gender is any more or less noble than being prejudiced against a specific race. I don't think girls who only do girl/girl are inherently 'better' or somehow less 'tainted' than girls who do guys either. But I'm not going to start harassing Kelle Marie, Sunny, Jana, Jesse et al for what they do or don't do...if b/g work comes, it comes, and if it doesn't, meh! If they can make a comfortable living doing g/g only, I don't see them as being somehow morally obliged to up their level to appease whichever niche fanboy group is bitching the loudest, be it b/g fans, IR fans, anal creampie fans or tranny fans.

Quote:


On the other hand, an actress that does B/G, but excludes a certain race guys is often a different matter. Sometimes it may boil down to managing her career to the most bucks. But in other cases its simply personal preferences - in other words discrimination.




Again, I don't see how a 'different level of personal choice' (in deciding not to do guys, or trannies, or anal creampies, or whatever) is any different from 'personal preferences' which you equate to discrimination.

Whilst I've no doubt some of these g/g only performers are in a relationship (and thus eschew b/g), some of them aren't...it's just that they don't want to do guys on camera full stop (or alternatively, as I have alluded to before, they are just waiting for the right offer to come along). Which ones are which I don't know, but I'm not going to pretend to know or take a guess either.

Hey, if these girls won't take dick on camera, there's plenty of others who will (and indeed do), and if you put the word 'black' before 'dick' in this sentence, I think you've got your catch-all answer.

Still, it's got me thinking...maybe I should storm AEE next year and confront these cock-dodgers with a banner saying 'Penis Power!', perhaps stage a sitdown protest at the Vivid booth with a crowd chanting about equal access to Sunny Leone's pussy for chicks and dicks, then march on Washington to demand an end to 'segregated' porn stars like Jana Cova...by whatever means necessary!