In response to the following statement here, "...Underage prostitution is a serious problem in Las Vegas,...," European piece of shit Steve Holmes answered thus:

Quote:


A problem for Whom?



further advocating it by adding:

Quote:


If a girl or guy decides to prostitute themselves the only problem they have is with the cops and maybe their parents.

I did it when I was 16 and it was fun.



driving home the point:

Quote:

Guys paid me to suck my dick and than I spend the money to fuck some chicks.



Is this sleazebag seriusly condoning child prostitution? How fucking sick can you get? I can think of quite a few people who think it's wrong, not the least of whom are the dirtbags who actually go out and try to hire child prostitutes. Steve, answer me honestly, how young would you go: sixteen, fourteen, would you try and fuck a hooker who hasn't gone through puberty yet? Maybe you can find some sadistic daddy who'd let you throatfuck his son in first grade? How can you write such utter stupidity and actually think it's justifiable. Steve, did it occur to you that most child protitutes actually don't want to be doing it, or are being forced by someone else? You are a fool if you think your limited "fun" experience as a gay child hooker makes it acceptable for anyone to consider such an option. There are moral absolutes, go reread your Prologomena.

Holmes' remark furthers the assumption that porn performers are morons. How can someone involved in porn, a business subject to stringent record-keeping laws (which they constantly bemoan) designed to avoid underage pornography, actually come out and advocate putting "children" (legally speaking) not in pornography, but in a sex business where there are no protections of agents, directors, or well-meaning advocacy groups like PAW and AIM.

Shame on Steve "Faggot" Holmes.