that clears up a lot, thank you. the nikki hunter stuff doesn't show up on the radar when i was having a hard time finding the name stagliano attached to anything benevolent or humanitarian but it wasn't something you hid giving to causes that divested primarily to pay for lawyers and lobbyists.

i'm still going to categorize you with those who could give enough to start something, fund a project signifigant to a larger organization, etc. based on what you could spend on the something i estimate the fashonistas would be in the ballpark of. the ratio of charity/indulgence was offputting like knowing what larry ellison spends on toys then having him give 100k away in sum one year. i didn't picture you living like rappers, but it didn't seem like you cared enough to give a real percentage of what you didn't need away.

you've cleared some things up but you're in a world of sycophancy and you need to remember that however outspoken they are, there aren't many in your industry that don't have to interact with you as a potential employer. beyond performers, everyone's three bad months from being on top of the world to looking for work like brandon. i'll never forget how pathetic ira levine was when he was talking about your husband in an interview.

nobody's going to call you on your shit-the consumers aren't and maybe 15 people in porn outside of the internet guys have nothing to potentially gain or keep by being in your good graces. do i think you could get away with requiring talent to test 2x a month? yeah. drug test the main three that people could be using needles with? you can piss clean in 24-72 hours with all of them and people would still show up to set for a grand or to be the next bella/manuel. you'd know who couldn't stop for a period measured in hours not days and need help and also tend to be slamming stuff. you could do stuff that could prevent the next karen from happening or help take care of them if they find themselves in your situation and they can't find a safety net.

i thought you were disingenuous about giving a shit about people when objectively stuff said you didn't.
you underestimate the leverage you have to do stuff you believe in and could be giving considerably more and not feel it financially.

care about your friends and be a better person in deed than you think you are right now? good, here's the cliff's notes version for the now wealthy:

10% or close is still the golden number for being able to consider yourself philanthropic.

now that many people could gain something from you, stop thinking like the person you grew up as that didn't want to push on them to accomodate you. try gently stepping on some toes-i bet you won't find the resistance you'd always expected.


i'm going to leave you alone and return to my regular role of posting pictures of smartt's penis. you don't have to justify anything or reply. just think about it.