Quote:

How about asking Mia or Holly? They have pay sites, I know Holly'$ rolling in doe.



C'mon...you can't seriously use Holly's site as a comparative example as to how well/poorly other girls' sites are performing.

The only way this comparison could possibly work would be if Holly set up her own site and posted pictures and videos of herself getting naked and doing rude things. I know Da Burglar would front her the startup cash.

Joking aside though, it's pretty obvious why people would opt to join Suze.net rather than a single girl site. If I have a thing for Aria Giovanni, Sunny Leone (who both have extremely well done sites), and, I dunno, let's say Veronika Zemanova as well. I could spend a little under $100 (per month) subscribing to their three individual sites, or I could just subscribe to Suze's site and get all 3 in one place (plus a shedload of other girls spanning the length and breath of Randall Sr.'s career) for about a third of the cash. Quality, variety, quantity vs. cost. It's simple math.

Also, Suze and co. know their respective asses from third base in terms of photography, lighting, styling, and all-around production value...the content on some of these lesser single girl sites is amateurish at best, and that's being pretty charitable...

All this talk has got me thinking. Does Sasha Grey have her own site yet? Hopefully with a forum that can be invaded by ADT fanbois beseeching her to do 'anal fruit salads' while discussing the relative merits of Barthes and Derrida, or perhaps reading selected quotations from Camus? Boy, that would be something to see....