Quote:

Quote:


I almost posted a note sharply calling out DAC for posting that rumor about Jewel with no cite and without bothering to confirm it.


Go for it jrv!! Put that pretentious jerk-off in his place!!



I finally did. What set me off were the assumptions that "Jewel must be guilty since she hasn't replied." When I checked I found that dac's accusation was the 369th post in a thread that started a month ago and that Jewel hadn't posted in that thread in the two weeks prior to dac's accusation. Jewel probably would never have seen it. And there is no supporting evidence anywhere.

It is interesting to note that within an hour of my posting my rant Saki closed the old HIV thread and started a new one. I'm no fan of censorship but for serious accusations I see no harm in ADT insisting accusers provide evidence or at least give the accused a chance to answer.
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock