Quote:

Why do candid photos of Gia have more stroke value than staged porno style shots? I have tried to understand this paradox for a long time.



Many examples of this phenomenon exist here at XPT and is one of the things that keeps me around. I've seen perhaps 3 scenes with Gia, yet none are as interesting or hott as her casual, NON-performing pics. Same goes for most other porn girls who get caught in candid moments.

I find non-performers who post here to be totally boner-inspiring...Holly, CEara, and now others like Robbye bentley, even Gonzo Girl. It has to do with my own "fantasy factory" inside my head. I like 'real' subject matter for fantasies. I like women, or scenarios involving women that JIVE with my own past real life sexual experiences. By that I mean chicks like Holly, Ceara, Gia in the above CASUAL photo, etc...they all look like chicks I have or would have sex with at some point in my life. NOT so with Boxcover shots of typical Porn chicks, or Chicks in actual PORN scenes. Only time I encounter chicks like that is in a Strip Club (maybe, and even then they are not as made-up as chicks in movie scenes.) Mia Rose, with no makeup in a tee shirt smoking pot with that "Bong-zilla" is something I readily relate to in my experience (think back to late nights in Dorm rooms at B.U. or Northeastern University)...however, Mia Rose in her famous "Butt-pose" for Holly Randall's scenes is NOT something I readily relate to or have experienced (unless I paid a escort to do that.)

Gia simply looks 'attainable' in this photo (not to mean she actually IS for anyone here, I said she just LOOKS like a REAL, attractive woman....period.)
_________________________
Are you gonna eat that?