Quote:

Quote:

Actually... California is a All consent state... all parties MUST consent..

Quote:

Cal. Penal Code §§ 631, 632: It is a crime in California to intercept or eavesdrop upon any confidential communication, including a telephone call or wire communication, without the consent of all parties.

It is also a crime to disclose information obtained from such an interception. A first offense is punishable by a fine of up to $2,500 and imprisonment for no more than one year. Subsequent offenses carry a maximum fine of $10,000 and jail sentence of up to one year.

Eavesdropping upon or recording a conversation, whether by telephone (including cordless or cellular telephone) or in person, that a person would reasonably expect to be confined to the parties present, carries the same penalty as intercepting telephone or wire communications.





That's interesting, but I'm not sure if it applies. Luke didn't "intercept" or "eavesdrop", he was a party to the conversation. I think this may only apply to third parties listening in. Where's the pornlaw dude, he'll know.




Nope, its the same law that exists in FL. It doesnt matter if it is third party or a party to conversation. If you record a phone call without informing the other party you are subject to this law. ALL parties must consent to the recording of the call. Hence why when you call a utility or something they will inform you "this call is being recorded." It is especially bad in this case because he posted the contents of the call online.
_________________________
"You're disgusting, you Caligula-esque mother fucker. But I like your avatar, so you get a pass. "-Chilledstoli If you're normal, people will accept you... but if you're DERANGED... they will make you their leader! -Christopher Titus