19072 Members
14 Forums
40341 Topics
614094 Posts
Max Online: 788 @ 09/28/24 10:05 AM
|
|
|
#218214 - 01/24/07 12:20 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 01/01/06
Posts: 459
Loc: California
|
Quote:
stick to using your lawyer schtick to try to fuck porn chicks bro. tiffany digivanni? vanessa blue? emily evermoore? who i am missing? our industry's first suitcase lawyer. good times.
I dont remember making this a personal issue. But you give me more credit than I deserve.
I dont have a problem with whatever you want to do. I represent a production company out of Las Vegas that does transsexual movies, Buck Angel is a client. Im not passing judgement on you. I really dont care enough about you to even have a thought about your personal choices. I do care about the industry though.
There's smart decisions and bad decisions in terms of this industry. Hiring ANY performer that works without tests outside of the US is asking for problems. Isnt that what happened a couple of years ago.
Last Spring I met with politicians/staffers from the California Assembly and Senate and they are concerned with this issue. They have hinted with the net HIV/AIDS outbreak regulation is going to be imposed on this industry. They have said to me personally, either the industry polices itself or they will through legislation.
So realize you carry a greater responsibility than you might imagine.
Quote:
Nope.
Part of the model release you sign as a performer is a statement that waives your right to collect damages if contracting ANY disease.
Most performers are independent contractors. They are responsible for their own health and even their own health insurance. Perhaps it is different for talent under contract...is it?
Thats just not true. Studios really want performers to buy into that. Before entering adult I represented Warner Bros, Fox, Universal, Entertainment Partners and Cast & Crew. Even performers that are hired for 1 day or scene are considered employees no matter what is in the contract. I defended a lot of cases involving stunt men and women.
Michael
AdultBizLaw.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218217 - 01/24/07 01:23 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Whoremaster
Registered: 10/21/05
Posts: 2710
|
Quote:
Quote:
From a legal perspective, if performer A works with performer B, who is known to do homosexual scenes without tests, and then A contracts HIV/AIDS/Hep C from B, A will have a solid case against that studio and producer for damages. If a director/studio chooses to use cross over performers it will only increase the liability for that director/studio in case something does happen.
Knowledge is a integral part of liability. We in the legal biz like to say "known or should have know" as a term or art. To hire a performer that knowingly and openly engages in extremely risky behavior is just not well thought out.
Michael
AdultBizLaw.com
stick to using your lawyer schtick to try to fuck porn chicks bro. tiffany digivanni? vanessa blue? emily evermoore? who i am missing? our industry's first suitcase lawyer. good times.
I hereby propose 'Suitcase Lawyer' as a new XPT poster rank! 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218218 - 01/24/07 01:45 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
ADT regular
Registered: 01/21/07
Posts: 12
Loc: Miami/L.A
|
Let me clarify the issue isnt what he does or doesnt do in his private life its him being a man and stepping up to the issue. He is a business man and making a nice career however I know for a FACT that the actress Jade he did the email thing was NOT AIM tested until the following week when she shot for Joey Silveria and was told "YOU MUST HAVE A TEST TO WORK FOR ME". ALso a FACT and whether Christian lies or has the guy lie that the gangbang in London was NOT A.I.M tested not the guy or the 3 shemales involved. Also Christian I know alot of transsexuals here in the U.S and abroad because of my best friend being a ts who knows you from the tranny club.I am NOT in the industry I am a gay guy who loves his tranny friends as well as an advocate for HIV testing within ALL communities NOt just tranny and gay. If you choose too continue working in every genre than make sure you require testing for ALL (man, woman, tranny). God forbid a mishap happens and everyone will jump to conclusions and blame the wrong sex because of homophobic people or sadly those who blanket all shemales with Brazillian shemales.
And dude you have met me afew times at 7969 while you and Pumper hide in the cornor trying to be all hard. Being the fag hag of a tranny does have its perks!!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218219 - 01/24/07 02:45 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 01/01/06
Posts: 459
Loc: California
|
Quote:
Michael, if you don't mind, I'm curious. I used to work H/R both in officer and consulting capacities. Was the daily worker employee qualification based upon the federal test or a California state law?
Its a California standard.
Here's some case law on point from the Second District Court of Appeals which is all of Los Angeles and would encompass most of the adult entertainment business and its production.
260 Cal.Rptr. 67
Craig JOHNSON, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
BERKOFSKY-BARRET PRODUCTIONS, INC., Defendant and Respondent.
FACTS
Johnson, an actor in television commercials, obtained acting jobs through a company called L'Image. Generally, L'Image directed Johnson to the shooting location of the commercial and advised him how to dress. The commercial production company then paid L'Image for Johnson's acting services and L'Image, in turn, paid Johnson after deducting its percentage fee.
On December 3, 1985, L'Image sent Johnson to the filming of an I.B.M. commercial produced by BBP in Lacy Park in San Marino, California. In answer to an interrogatory Johnson described what happened during one of the takes of the commercial as follows: "The scene was a softball game and I played the pitcher. I was instructed to dive for a grounder, miss it, and ham it up. I dove for a ground ball, landing squarely on my shoulder, causing my injuried [sic]."
On July 16, 1986, Johnson filed a civil complaint for personal injury against BBP. Johnson admitted both in answers to interrogatories and at his deposition the director and assistant director of the commercial had supervised him and instructed him how to perform.
On or about June 25, 1987, Johnson filed a claim with the Worker's Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) against BBP for injuries arising out of the accident.
BBP filed a motion for summary judgment on February 26, 1988, on the theory Johnson was a "special employee" of BBP and therefore limited to workers' compensation remedies for the personal injuries suffered while filming the commercial. [3]
In opposition to the motion for summary judgment, Johnson claimed he was not an employee of L'Image but had hired L'Image as an agent to obtain work for him. He concludes he could not be BBP's "special employee" because he had never been an employee of L'Image.
Page 1071
Although the parties have not supplied a reporter's transcript of the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, Johnson contends, and BBP does not dispute, that the trial court found Johnson's workers' compensation claim constituted an admission he was BBP's employee and granted summary judgment on that basis in favor of BBP.
CONCLUSION
Johnson's concession that BBP controlled and directed every aspect of his employment and our consideration of secondary determining factors renders Johnson an employee as a matter of law. As such, Johnson's exclusive remedy for his work related injury is workers' compensation.
I left out 90% of the decision, but you should get the idea. Johnson WANTED to be an independent contractor not an employee. Independent contractors, ie performers that contract a disease on set would actually be able to recover more damages than an employee performer because of punitives.
Michael
AdultBizLaw.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218220 - 01/24/07 02:49 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 11/04/06
Posts: 4203
Loc: Bakersfield Plumbing Supplies ...
|
A wittier man than I would make an "injured johnson" joke about now.
_________________________
I also am subcribe to postal pornography - CAOH
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218222 - 01/24/07 03:00 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 09/23/04
Posts: 10321
|
Quote:
I love it, getting schooled on California employment case law on a Porn Blog. Only in America my friends. 
More correctly- only on XPT.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218226 - 01/24/07 03:27 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 01/01/06
Posts: 459
Loc: California
|
Just one final thought --
I was invited to participate in a Think Tank @ UCLA as to safety in the workplace in the adult entertainment industry. Unfortunately I had a prior engagement and I could not attend. However, another adult entertainment attorney Greg Piccionelli did attend and he just wrote an article for XBiz about the meeting.
To quote his article - "According to CAL/OSHA the level of control that adult content producers generally exercise over performers in the rendering of their services makes adult perfomers employees and not independent contractors under state law."
So there you have it directly from the state.
Michael
AdultBizLaw.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218227 - 01/24/07 03:28 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Rob Black's Crack Pipe
Registered: 07/05/06
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
Quote:
Fatman, most girls do not know. Its not like there is a huge poster at AIM that lists performers who do straight movies, but are also bi-sexual, gay whatever, and make movies and escort with trannies and men. Its the same way they do not know that Talon worked as a gay performer using the name Lex Baldwin.
okay, sorry the lack of responses....i was on set all day. once again, sexycity is 100 percent wrong. most of the girls i work with know, how could they not? and i have gotten to the point in this business where i only work with directors that i work for all the time. so i get to pick and choose the girls i work with many times. so i dont work with a lot of newbies. i have never denied anything to anyone.
Key to that statement "most" not all know. I know for a fact you lobbied some girls to do scenes with you at the AVN's that had no idea. Some its no big deal to and some have done scenes then found out and pulled him off their list and to some it is a major deal. I think you should man up and when your going to work someone for the first time you should tell them beforehand. In not doing so is plain wrong
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#218228 - 01/24/07 03:42 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Ed Hardy Wearing Loser
Registered: 01/22/06
Posts: 41
Loc: Inmyhouse, CA
|
stick to using your lawyer schtick to try to fuck porn chicks bro. tiffany digivanni? vanessa blue? emily evermoore? who i am missing? our industry's first suitcase lawyer. good times.
Christian, please leave my name out of your dick-sucking mouth. I tried to be pleasant and professional about things when I knew I had to work with you for Naughty America and I even tried to be civil when you cried to my boss at a certain video company and acted like a girl about why I wouldn't shoot you in any of my productions but whats the point in being nice when you seem to like getting it up the ass so rough and hard? So here's my deep stroke in you just like I know you like it:
-From a performance standpoint- I think you're pretty good. You got great stamina and your dick works and blah, blah, blah. Although I did request that my agent at that time not book me with you he did anyway and subsequently I left his agency shortly thereafter. I realize it truly is a performers duty to check into whom she will be working with when she get's booked for a scene since an agents interest may only be about money. Fine I accept that. I worked with you and then got tested once every week for the next month. Now I do it monthly just for my own piece of mind.
-From a directors standpoint-You are a BITCH. A whiney little bitch. I simply can't find any other words that fit. Only a bitch would cry to the boss and plead that he make me shoot you. That shit was funny as hell. And then you were cool enough to take the time out to text me for over an hour about my choices and who I hire. Even a chick would have had the balls to call me and curse at me, you text messaged me!! LOL! Remember this- I can direct, I can fuck you, I can edit and I can fuck you in the ass too. It's always my choice to do it or not to do it. We did a scene and it was cool but that was before I knew everything about you. I was not told any of the truth about you and had I been told I would have walked off the set immediately. (My body, my choice.)
And after you snitched on me your tri-sexual ass was fair game. You can call me bi-polar, crazy, whatever you want but when I get hired to direct I get to do what I want to.
From a personal standpoint- From my own personal experiences I am simply not into bisexual men, nor do I wish to shoot them with girls I consider friends. I used to shoot content for a gay website and I swear I NEVER ONCE SAW ANYONE SWAP AN HIV TEST. Now while everyone must realize that at least half the males in porn are bi there are still a few straight ones and I will lean more toward them when I book my shoots. I no longer perform boy-girl thanks to nut gurgling men like you who moonlight as straight males by day and gay contract stars by night. That is my choice as I would like to live. I regret doing a scene with you from a safety standpoint because I did not know you were ever a gay video star I thought you were just some internet fan who wanted me to fuck his dirty ass on my FemDomX site. You begged me for months to do a strap on scene with you and I turned you down and you blasted me on ADT?! For what I still don't know. I let that slide because I thought how could a guy so hot want me to fuck him like a bitch? He's gotta be lying or crazy! But you're both, a liar and you're crazy just admit you did it and if it bothers you so much stop commenting on this board. But like any other dysfunctional whore in this game you like the attention. But attention whores never really get the kind of attention they're craving do they?
Tell you what, I got some free time later wanna come over and gimmie some of that sweet ass of yours? And I swear there will be no donkey punches or slap happy dicksucking, you're way too special for that!
I know you got some free time too now, my homegirl told me about all those sudden cancellations..........that's gotta suck. Whoops- I mean you better get to suckin! ROFLMAO!
BTW, Gia J. - you have to be the brightest crayon in the entire box of XXXPT crayons! I love reading your posts! You guys make me laugh so fuckin hard! This board rocks! 
Love always,
your secret admirer!! 
_________________________
-I'm such a bitch.........
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218229 - 01/24/07 03:59 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Fucking Master
Registered: 10/30/06
Posts: 3812
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
Quote:
Quote:
stick to using your lawyer schtick to try to fuck porn chicks bro. tiffany digivanni? vanessa blue? emily evermoore? who i am missing? our industry's first suitcase lawyer. good times.
Christian, please leave my name out of your dick-sucking mouth. I tried to be pleasant and professional about things when I knew I had to work with you for Naughty America and I even tried to be civil when you cried to my boss at a certain video company and acted like a girl about why I wouldn't shoot you in any of my productions but whats the point in being nice when you seem to like getting it up the ass so rough and hard? So here's my deep stroke in you just like I know you like it:
-From a performance standpoint- I think you're pretty good. You got great stamina and your dick works and blah, blah, blah. Although I did request that my agent at that time not book me with you he did anyway and subsequently I left his agency shortly thereafter. I realize it truly is a performers duty to check into whom she will be working with when she get's booked for a scene since an agents interest may only be about money. Fine I accept that. I worked with you and then got tested once every week for the next month. Now I do it monthly just for my own piece of mind.
-From a directors standpoint-You are a BITCH. A whiney little bitch. I simply can't find any other words that fit. Only a bitch would cry to the boss and plead that he make me shoot you. That shit was funny as hell. And then you were cool enough to take the time out to text me for over an hour about my choices and who I hire. Even a chick would have had the balls to call me and curse at me, you text messaged me!! LOL! Remember this- I can direct, I can fuck you, I can edit and I can fuck you in the ass too. It's always my choice to do it or not to do it. We did a scene and it was cool but that was before I knew everything about you. I was not told any of the truth about you and had I been told I would have walked off the set immediately. (My body, my choice.)
And after you snitched on me your tri-sexual ass was fair game. You can call me bi-polar, crazy, whatever you want but when I get hired to direct I get to do what I want to.
From a personal standpoint- From my own personal experiences I am simply not into bisexual men, nor do I wish to shoot them with girls I consider friends. I used to shoot content for a gay website and I swear I NEVER ONCE SAW ANYONE SWAP AN HIV TEST. Now while everyone must realize that at least half the males in porn are bi there are still a few straight ones and I will lean more toward them when I book my shoots. I no longer perform boy-girl thanks to nut gurgling men like you who moonlight as straight males by day and gay contract stars by night. That is my choice as I would like to live. I regret doing a scene with you from a safety standpoint because I did not know you were ever a gay video star I thought you were just some internet fan who wanted me to fuck his dirty ass on my FemDomX site. You begged me for months to do a strap on scene with you and I turned you down and you blasted me on ADT?! For what I still don't know. I let that slide because I thought how could a guy so hot want me to fuck him like a bitch? He's gotta be lying or crazy! But you're both, a liar and you're crazy just admit you did it and if it bothers you so much stop commenting on this board. But like any other dysfunctional whore in this game you like the attention. But attention whores never really get the kind of attention they're craving do they?
Tell you what, I got some free time later wanna come over and gimmie some of that sweet ass of yours? And I swear there will be no donkey punches or slap happy dicksucking, you're way too special for that!
I know you got some free time too now, my homegirl told me about all those sudden cancellations..........that's gotta suck. Whoops- I mean you better get to suckin! ROFLMAO!
BTW, Gia J. - you have to be the brightest crayon in the entire box of XXXPT crayons! I love reading your posts! You guys make me laugh so fuckin hard! This board rocks!
Love always,
your secret admirer!!
Holy hell... I think i'm in love.  
[ed: fixed your quotes]
Edited by Willie D (01/24/07 05:26 PM)
_________________________
"You know this is XXXPornTalk.com right? You sound like an ADT person. I want to poop on you." -Malice
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218230 - 01/24/07 04:05 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Kurt Lackwood's Fluffer
Registered: 01/16/07
Posts: 1166
|
Quote:
-From a directors standpoint-You are a BITCH. A whiney little bitch.
you know, I've shot Christian many times, and never one could I think to refer to him as a bitch. He's a damn good performer and as long as he shows up on set with a clean test, a good attitude and can perform a good scene... i don't care if he was fucking his mothers dogs puppies while they were strapped to the steering wheel of his car and shoving kittens up his ass to catch gerbils. Thats his business, what he does on my set is my business and thats all I care about.
Is what he does risky?
could be.
But is it any riskier than the behaviours of most any other performer in the biz, male or female? At least with Christian it is on screen, out in the open, and not denied.
_________________________
"You're disgusting, you Caligula-esque mother fucker.
But I like your avatar, so you get a pass. "-Chilledstoli
If you're normal, people will accept you... but if you're DERANGED... they will make you their leader! -Christopher Titus
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218231 - 01/24/07 04:07 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 06/05/05
Posts: 4468
Loc: Great America
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218234 - 01/24/07 04:20 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Kurt Lackwood's Fluffer
Registered: 01/16/07
Posts: 1166
|
nope, not with AMA, haven't been in over a year now (though i was there for about a year too long... but thats a discussion for another time, the less i think about joe, the less i want to hit things) I've been away from the biz for a year, seeking help for my own problems. I was referring to when i was shooting. And, as much as I don't care what he does... i could never film two guys going it... just cause, for lack of a better word... its icky, but thats just my personal view of having to witness the act.
_________________________
"You're disgusting, you Caligula-esque mother fucker.
But I like your avatar, so you get a pass. "-Chilledstoli
If you're normal, people will accept you... but if you're DERANGED... they will make you their leader! -Christopher Titus
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218235 - 01/24/07 04:32 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 01/12/05
Posts: 7322
Loc: The Children's Limbo
|
Someone should make a porn where a guy, a girl and a tranny all fsck one another at the same time. At no point in the video should there be someone not being fscked. While the man is fscking the tranny, the tranny should be fscking the girl. And the girl can get a strap-on and fsck the tranny while it fscks the dude. You can even throw Buck Angel or Diesel in the mix. In the end everyone should swap and swallow sperm, leaving the girl to squirt (piss) on the other two.
_________________________
I hit her with the hammer on top of the head. She made a lot of noise and kept on making noise, so I hit her again.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218236 - 01/24/07 04:34 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 01/01/06
Posts: 459
Loc: California
|
Quote:
i don't care if he was fucking his mothers dogs puppies while they were strapped to the steering wheel of his car and shoving kittens up his ass to catch gerbils.
You should because its going to be you/your production company that gets hit with the CAL/OSHA fines and the lawsuit.
Michael
AdultBizLaw.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218239 - 01/24/07 04:49 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Kurt Lackwood's Fluffer
Registered: 12/09/05
Posts: 1291
|
god, this whole thread seems like a rehash of a few months ago. all sex workers face infection, it's a choice they knowingly make. the information about christian is out there, people can choose whether or not to work with him based upon it. talking about poor innocent girls who don't know about his extracurricular activities is bullshit- if you're going to sell your vagina for money in a potentially dangerous industry, the bare minimum you can do for yourself is to do your own research on the person you'll be selling your vagina to. the conflicting attitudes of some xpt'ers is amazing- happy to see 18 year olds with mental illnesses gagged and sodomized, yet concerned that these same girls might not know about christian's tranny love. you can't play captain save-a-ho whilst still enjoying porn, you just can't. if you were so concerned with the wellbeing of performers you would be anti-porn- just through reading xpt it should be apparent how few "winners" there seem to be in this industry. stop rationalising your behaviour- you are masturbating to people's emotional turmoil. you are not a good person and most likely you do not deserve the love of a good woman. finally: Quote:
Quote:
stick to using your lawyer schtick to try to fuck porn chicks bro. tiffany digivanni? vanessa blue? emily evermoore? who i am missing? our industry's first suitcase lawyer. good times.
Christian, please leave my name out of your dick-sucking mouth. I tried to be pleasant and professional about things when I knew I had to work with you for Naughty America and I even tried to be civil when you cried to my boss at a certain video company and acted like a girl about why I wouldn't shoot you in any of my productions but whats the point in being nice when you seem to like getting it up the ass so rough and hard? So here's my deep stroke in you just like I know you like it:
-From a performance standpoint- I think you're pretty good. You got great stamina and your dick works and blah, blah, blah. Although I did request that my agent at that time not book me with you he did anyway and subsequently I left his agency shortly thereafter. I realize it truly is a performers duty to check into whom she will be working with when she get's booked for a scene since an agents interest may only be about money. Fine I accept that. I worked with you and then got tested once every week for the next month. Now I do it monthly just for my own piece of mind.
-From a directors standpoint-You are a BITCH. A whiney little bitch. I simply can't find any other words that fit. Only a bitch would cry to the boss and plead that he make me shoot you. That shit was funny as hell. And then you were cool enough to take the time out to text me for over an hour about my choices and who I hire. Even a chick would have had the balls to call me and curse at me, you text messaged me!! LOL! Remember this- I can direct, I can fuck you, I can edit and I can fuck you in the ass too. It's always my choice to do it or not to do it. We did a scene and it was cool but that was before I knew everything about you. I was not told any of the truth about you and had I been told I would have walked off the set immediately. (My body, my choice.)
And after you snitched on me your tri-sexual ass was fair game. You can call me bi-polar, crazy, whatever you want but when I get hired to direct I get to do what I want to.
From a personal standpoint- From my own personal experiences I am simply not into bisexual men, nor do I wish to shoot them with girls I consider friends. I used to shoot content for a gay website and I swear I NEVER ONCE SAW ANYONE SWAP AN HIV TEST. Now while everyone must realize that at least half the males in porn are bi there are still a few straight ones and I will lean more toward them when I book my shoots. I no longer perform boy-girl thanks to nut gurgling men like you who moonlight as straight males by day and gay contract stars by night. That is my choice as I would like to live. I regret doing a scene with you from a safety standpoint because I did not know you were ever a gay video star I thought you were just some internet fan who wanted me to fuck his dirty ass on my FemDomX site. You begged me for months to do a strap on scene with you and I turned you down and you blasted me on ADT?! For what I still don't know. I let that slide because I thought how could a guy so hot want me to fuck him like a bitch? He's gotta be lying or crazy! But you're both, a liar and you're crazy just admit you did it and if it bothers you so much stop commenting on this board. But like any other dysfunctional whore in this game you like the attention. But attention whores never really get the kind of attention they're craving do they?
Tell you what, I got some free time later wanna come over and gimmie some of that sweet ass of yours? And I swear there will be no donkey punches or slap happy dicksucking, you're way too special for that!
I know you got some free time too now, my homegirl told me about all those sudden cancellations..........that's gotta suck. Whoops- I mean you better get to suckin! ROFLMAO!
BTW, Gia J. - you have to be the brightest crayon in the entire box of XXXPT crayons! I love reading your posts! You guys make me laugh so fuckin hard! This board rocks!
Love always,
your secret admirer!!
this was like leah luv's attack on threesomebody- out of nowhere, lethal and great entertainment. it's this that brings me back to xpt time and again
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218242 - 01/24/07 05:59 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
ADT regular
Registered: 01/21/07
Posts: 12
Loc: Miami/L.A
|
Well sadly among the gay adult community testing is 50/50 however you cant group American Transsexuals among the "AIDS phobia" since they are required for A.I.M testing just as any female pornstar. And atleast you admit the lack of understanding however someone is buying it or there wouldnt be such a huge demand for the stuff. I as a gay male dont see the big thing about fetish stuff but Im not going to spit venom and bash the bdsm group because I dont personally care for it or understand it. Porn is a multi billion dollar market yearly so there is a market and fan base for literally anything.
The debate isnt what we "personally" like or dislike but whether men or females who work within other genre's should be held to a higher standard because of the risk whether that person is a male or female. If the answer is yes then EVERY person that Christian a.k.a Maxx Diesel works with should be required whether its via internet or dvd to be tested, I would have NO problem but he doesnt. I can give you numerous websites and names of individuals he has worked with that he did NOT ask for a H.I.V test from and that is wrong and adding to the stereotypes of bisexual, gay, and transgendered people!
Edited by JuanR (01/24/07 06:03 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218243 - 01/24/07 06:20 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 01/12/05
Posts: 7322
Loc: The Children's Limbo
|
I completely missed the Domina Blue post. Things just got very interesting around here.
_________________________
I hit her with the hammer on top of the head. She made a lot of noise and kept on making noise, so I hit her again.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218244 - 01/24/07 06:46 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 09/20/05
Posts: 9184
|
Quote:
The debate isnt [sic] what we "personally" like or dislike but whether men or females who work within other genre's [sic] should be held to a higher standard because of the risk whether that person is a male or female. If the answer is yes [sic] then EVERY person that Christian a.k.a Maxx Diesel works with should be required whether its via internet or dvd to be tested, [sic] I would have NO problem but he doesnt [sic]. I can give you numerous websites and names of individuals he has worked with that he did NOT ask for a H.I.V test from and that is wrong and adding to the stereotypes of bisexual, gay, and transgendered people!
Name them here and now. Include the name of the site, date the scene was posted, and name of the other performer. Then provide us with their phone number so we can call and verify what you said.
So now you're playing Captain Save-a-Ho for gay porn? Jesus, why don't you just call kate/arthur and let him start bumping that shit about porn directors being homophobic?
Douchebag. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218246 - 01/24/07 08:23 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Pervert
Registered: 07/05/05
Posts: 2134
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
good lord....i was at work all day and i missed like 40 posts! i guess i should address some things in order.
1. vanessa blue should be bitter, i would be too if i got fired from a company b/c she refused to use me. lol....but the bottom line is she is a bitter woman b/c lex dumped her and i already fucked her so whatever.
2. its just hard to take pornlaw seriously when he dates girls in the business and hangs out with vanessa blue. he obviously has an agenda. and pornlaw leaves out so many questions, by saying blanket statements.
a. is there a difference in homosexual (girl vs. guy) in the eyes of the law?
b. how can you prove that a company should have known about the past scenes of a performer?
c. how do you get around signing model releases?
3. i love how random people using fake names (juan r, seeya, etc) want me to divulge personal information and "man up"......how fucking ironic is that?
4. any scene that is not AIM tested is ALWAYS condom! ALWAYS. do any of you really believe i have a death wish? do you really believe that i don't care about the other performers that i work with? i resent the implication that i am any more risky than any other performers out there. none of you say a single fucking thing about all of the girls and guys in our business who are regular IV drug users, and you all know that there are some.
4. once again, let me restate, i work for the same companies over and over and they will always use me. so if some girls wont work with me, thats fine. there will be girls that will. so you can keep bringing this crap up to your hearts desire, it only makes me more popular and gets me more work. so thank you to all the haters!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218247 - 01/24/07 08:45 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 09/20/05
Posts: 9184
|
Quote:
4. any scene that is not AIM tested is ALWAYS condom! ALWAYS. do any of you really believe i have a death wish? do you really believe that i don't care about the other performers that i work with? i resent the implication that i am any more risky than any other performers out there. none of you say a single fucking thing about all of the girls and guys in our business who are regular IV drug users, and you all know that there are some.
Most cogent point in the whole post...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218248 - 01/24/07 08:48 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Rob Black's Crack Pipe
Registered: 07/05/06
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
good lord....i was at work all day and i missed like 40 posts! i guess i should address some things in order.
1. vanessa blue should be bitter, i would be too if i got fired from a company b/c she refused to use me. lol....but the bottom line is she is a bitter woman b/c lex dumped her and i already fucked her so whatever.
2. its just hard to take pornlaw seriously when he dates girls in the business and hangs out with vanessa blue. he obviously has an agenda. and pornlaw leaves out so many questions, by saying blanket statements.
a. is there a difference in homosexual (girl vs. guy) in the eyes of the law?
b. how can you prove that a company should have known about the past scenes of a performer?
c. how do you get around signing model releases?
3. i love how random people using fake names (juan r, seeya, etc) want me to divulge personal information and "man up"......how fucking ironic is that?
4. any scene that is not AIM tested is ALWAYS condom! ALWAYS. do any of you really believe i have a death wish? do you really believe that i don't care about the other performers that i work with? i resent the implication that i am any more risky than any other performers out there. none of you say a single fucking thing about all of the girls and guys in our business who are regular IV drug users, and you all know that there are some.
4. once again, let me restate, i work for the same companies over and over and they will always use me. so if some girls wont work with me, thats fine. there will be girls that will. so you can keep bringing this crap up to your hearts desire, it only makes me more popular and gets me more work. so thank you to all the haters!
to answer your number 3 were not the ones who are putting other performers at risk you are. You not think they have the right to know?
and to the first #4 When you do a non AIM tested suit you say you always use condoms which is great. Do you retest before shooting AIM regulated shoots? Cause to my knowledge condoms are not 100% safe at the pervention of HIV. I agree with you that Id stay clear of performers who are IV drug users they like you are putting everyone at risk.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218249 - 01/24/07 09:13 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Pervert
Registered: 07/05/05
Posts: 2134
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
Quote:
Quote:
good lord....i was at work all day and i missed like 40 posts! i guess i should address some things in order.
1. vanessa blue should be bitter, i would be too if i got fired from a company b/c she refused to use me. lol....but the bottom line is she is a bitter woman b/c lex dumped her and i already fucked her so whatever.
2. its just hard to take pornlaw seriously when he dates girls in the business and hangs out with vanessa blue. he obviously has an agenda. and pornlaw leaves out so many questions, by saying blanket statements.
a. is there a difference in homosexual (girl vs. guy) in the eyes of the law?
b. how can you prove that a company should have known about the past scenes of a performer?
c. how do you get around signing model releases?
3. i love how random people using fake names (juan r, seeya, etc) want me to divulge personal information and "man up"......how fucking ironic is that?
4. any scene that is not AIM tested is ALWAYS condom! ALWAYS. do any of you really believe i have a death wish? do you really believe that i don't care about the other performers that i work with? i resent the implication that i am any more risky than any other performers out there. none of you say a single fucking thing about all of the girls and guys in our business who are regular IV drug users, and you all know that there are some.
4. once again, let me restate, i work for the same companies over and over and they will always use me. so if some girls wont work with me, thats fine. there will be girls that will. so you can keep bringing this crap up to your hearts desire, it only makes me more popular and gets me more work. so thank you to all the haters!
to answer your number 3 were not the ones who are putting other performers at risk you are. You not think they have the right to know?
and to the first #4 When you do a non AIM tested suit you say you always use condoms which is great. Do you retest before shooting AIM regulated shoots? Cause to my knowledge condoms are not 100% safe at the pervention of HIV. I agree with you that Id stay clear of performers who are IV drug users they like you are putting everyone at risk.
okay, so lets recap......
1. performers doing any scenes with shemales or guys (condom or non)
2. performers who are drug users
3. performers who have sex off camera with people who arent AIM tested (non condom) - (ex. hooking, escorting)
4. male performers who have sex off camera with shemales, guys with or without condoms
so....how many people do you think are left on the outside of these categories? lol....how do you guys differentiate any of these? is there an order of safety in these?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218250 - 01/24/07 09:20 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Rob Black's Crack Pipe
Registered: 07/05/06
Posts: 98
|
So you dont think doing scenes in a unregulated sex industry granted you say use condoms in all non AIM shoots You not at a higher risk rate? I think if you asked the people at AIM they would kinda disagree with you there
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218251 - 01/24/07 09:22 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Rob Black's Crack Pipe
Registered: 07/05/06
Posts: 98
|
And yes the porn industry better start regulating itself better cause someone is going to fuck up soonier or later. I think the AIM testing should be weekly instead of every 39 days. Just think just think if you did get unlucky and draw a HIV infected performer in one of these untested shoots are you 100% sure that condom will protect you? Do you expect the girl your doing a scene the next at a AIM regulated shoot the next day to be !100% certain that condom protected you? Thats alot to ask
Edited by seeya (01/24/07 09:32 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218252 - 01/24/07 09:31 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 04/14/06
Posts: 14755
Loc: Busy downloading [LEGALLY!]
|
Quote:
Do you retest before shooting AIM regulated shoots?
In all fairness, does anybody test between shoots if they have sex with their girlfriend/boyfriend. That is quite possibly unprotected and who even knows if that other person has ever even had a test.
Whether Christian directly tells a girl or not, it is quite plain everyone should know his history. I know almost nothing about this crap AND I KNOW HIS HISTORY!
If there are those who hide this from their co-stars, that is quite unfortunate.
To Christian on PornLaw:
The point is that there is a precedent decision where a 1099 film performer was injured and it was decided that the person was misclassified. Based upon specific "tests" they decided that the performer was an employee and NOT an independent contractor. It is up to employers to properly categorize those that they compensate. Thus the performer was due Workman's Comp - and likely the State will go back thru every god-damn 1099 listed employee and hit the employer up for WC payments and penalties out the wazoo. Plus since the employer never reported the person, they likely have to pay his statutory compensation out of their own pocket. I don't know CA law on this, but the person might also be able to sue on top of the benefit.
The point: If a porn performer were injured by any work related activity that person could cite this case and likely win since there is really no difference in the activities of a porn and mainstream movie performer other than sex. So, the argument goes, if a person were infected during a scene, b/b, b/g, etc., that person could pursue compensation from the production company by case precedent. Any and all other agreements would be void since you cannot have a contract that violates the law. And, for example, incorrect assignment of an employee as a 1099er is a violation of law. Not properly informing them of their WC eligibility is a violation of law. etc
How that person would prove such an injury occurred in the commission of a specific action from a specific actor on a specific day might prove interesting.
_________________________
Amo i Gemelli!! 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218253 - 01/24/07 09:33 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 09/20/05
Posts: 9184
|
Quote:
soonier
Way to catch this after the spellcheker ran, dddoouuuchhebbaaggg.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218254 - 01/24/07 11:53 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
AC Cream Wannabe
Registered: 01/01/06
Posts: 459
Loc: California
|
Quote:
The point: If a porn performer were injured by any work related activity that person could cite this case and likely win since there is really no difference in the activities of a porn and mainstream movie performer other than sex. So, the argument goes, if a person were infected during a scene, b/b, b/g, etc., that person could pursue compensation from the production company by case precedent. Any and all other agreements would be void since you cannot have a contract that violates the law. And, for example, incorrect assignment of an employee as a 1099er is a violation of law. Not properly informing them of their WC eligibility is a violation of law. etc
How that person would prove such an injury occurred in the commission of a specific action from a specific actor on a specific day might prove interesting.
Fatman - 100% correct on the 1st point and on the second, if it was HIV it wouldnt be hard to trace it to the party that caused the infection. Tracing back and building an "exposure tree" is what AIM did during the last outbreak.
And Christian, seriously, why are you so interested in my personal life. Like I said I could careless what you do in yours, only when you put my clients at risk do I care. I think its remarkable hypocritical to question who I may or may not sleep with when you are obviously not bothered by any type of sexuality.
But to answer your questions - my agenda is to illustrate to the rest of the industry that your attitude is not only dangerous to the other performers but also to the industry as a whole.
(a) No difference between hetero, homo or transgendered sex acts
(b) At least with you it will be rather easy
(c) if you actually read my posts you would see the model releases dont matter. Concentrate on with having sex with trannies and I will handle the law.
Michael
AdultBizLaw.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218255 - 01/25/07 12:15 AM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Pervert
Registered: 07/05/05
Posts: 2134
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
Quote:
Quote:
The point: If a porn performer were injured by any work related activity that person could cite this case and likely win since there is really no difference in the activities of a porn and mainstream movie performer other than sex. So, the argument goes, if a person were infected during a scene, b/b, b/g, etc., that person could pursue compensation from the production company by case precedent. Any and all other agreements would be void since you cannot have a contract that violates the law. And, for example, incorrect assignment of an employee as a 1099er is a violation of law. Not properly informing them of their WC eligibility is a violation of law. etc
How that person would prove such an injury occurred in the commission of a specific action from a specific actor on a specific day might prove interesting.
Fatman - 100% correct on the 1st point and on the second, if it was HIV it wouldnt be hard to trace it to the party that caused the infection. Tracing back and building an "exposure tree" is what AIM did during the last outbreak.
And Christian, seriously, why are you so interested in my personal life. Like I said I could careless what you do in yours, only when you put my clients at risk do I care. I think its remarkable hypocritical to question who I may or may not sleep with when you are obviously not bothered by any type of sexuality.
But to answer your questions - my agenda is to illustrate to the rest of the industry that your attitude is not only dangerous to the other performers but also to the industry as a whole.
(a) No difference between hetero, homo or transgendered sex acts
(b) At least with you it will be rather easy
(c) if you actually read my posts you would see the model releases dont matter. Concentrate on with having sex with trannies and I will handle the law.
Michael
AdultBizLaw.com
how could i deign to question the expertise of someone who is too lazy to chase ambulances so he preys on the young girls in our business who dont know any better? how altruistic of you.
so if i do one condom shemale scene every 6 months, then somehow that correlates to being a "danger" to our industry? meanwhile, half of your fucking "clients" (in more ways than one) are doing god knows when the camera isnt rolling. you sir have no credibility with me, nor anyone else in this business. i can assure you with 100 percent that you will never be litigating any case involving me, ever. i am one of the safest people in this business, and i have about 40 straight months of good AIM tests to prove it. go ahead and check the records bro. one more time....40 straight good AIM tests. so please turn your attention to getting more new girls as "clients" and leave me the hell alone. because, once again, for the millionth time...i am not going anywhere. i am still going to be working every day, sometimes twice a day, for the same companies i always work for.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218259 - 01/25/07 08:33 AM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Pervert
Registered: 07/05/05
Posts: 2134
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
Quote:
I think we've missed something here...
Quote:
And dude you have met me a few times at 7969 while you and Pumper hide in the corner trying to be all hard. Being the fag hag of a tranny does have its perks!!
BrianPumper?!! Figures... 
i have never hung out with that dude a single time in my life. nor would i ever go out with him, much less to a club
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#218260 - 01/25/07 09:20 AM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Porn Jesus
Registered: 09/20/05
Posts: 9184
|
Just for the record, a short list from www.cavr.com of the whores who have done scenes with shemales...it's long: Belladonna Cris Taliana Jessica Darlin Kate Frost Dana Vespoli Delilah Strong Christie Lee Cindy Crawford Cytherea Deja Daire Roxy Jezel Joselyn Pink Trinity Post Ariana Jollee Luscious Lopez Avy Lee Roth Renee Pornero Delilah Strong
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218261 - 01/25/07 09:34 AM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Bukkake Boy
Registered: 06/13/06
Posts: 611
|
Quote:
Because "whores" are supposed to push the limits of cumreceptacle-ness for your viewing pleasure. A man who has sex with other men or transsexuals finds his masculinity called into question. It's not fair, but that's how it is, to answer your rhetorical question.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218262 - 01/25/07 12:47 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
ADT regular
Registered: 01/21/07
Posts: 12
Loc: Miami/L.A
|
Chrissy Chrissy I mean Christian you still LIE LIE LIE. First I never said you and Pumper hang out I said you two like to hide in the cornor. You say "1 Condom shemale shoot in 6 months" Dude you shot the bareback video for Leoron the bareback sandwhich end of last year as well as the orgy during your London trip as well as the shemale email video end of last year so thats 2 condom and 1 bareback at the minimum but when my friend gets home tonight Ill pick her brain and see how much more of a lie I can call you out on. Its not the fact you do it, its the fact you LIE. Oh wait wait I heard at the AEE show about something else but let me verify it before I lie like you do!!!
And dude Im not hiding behind a screen name like you think the next time I see you I will be more than happy to introduce myself AGAIN.
J.R
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#218263 - 01/25/07 06:28 PM
Re: Christians latest bareback tranny video
|
Internet Tough Guy
Registered: 05/02/04
Posts: 797
|
I m hijacking the thread, ya'll.
Quote from one of "pornlaw" 's posts:
"Before entering adult I represented Warner Bros, Fox, Universal, Entertainment Partners and Cast & Crew. "
I just wanna know why a lawyer who's working for such huge movie companies, whos probably making a shit-fucking-load of money, decides to quit and be a porn industry lawyer???
_________________________
"your size, and below.." Patricia Petite , to Pariah .
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (TFerguson),
422
Guests and
4
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index
