Quote:

Quote:

The point: If a porn performer were injured by any work related activity that person could cite this case and likely win since there is really no difference in the activities of a porn and mainstream movie performer other than sex. So, the argument goes, if a person were infected during a scene, b/b, b/g, etc., that person could pursue compensation from the production company by case precedent. Any and all other agreements would be void since you cannot have a contract that violates the law. And, for example, incorrect assignment of an employee as a 1099er is a violation of law. Not properly informing them of their WC eligibility is a violation of law. etc

How that person would prove such an injury occurred in the commission of a specific action from a specific actor on a specific day might prove interesting.




Fatman - 100% correct on the 1st point and on the second, if it was HIV it wouldnt be hard to trace it to the party that caused the infection. Tracing back and building an "exposure tree" is what AIM did during the last outbreak.

And Christian, seriously, why are you so interested in my personal life. Like I said I could careless what you do in yours, only when you put my clients at risk do I care. I think its remarkable hypocritical to question who I may or may not sleep with when you are obviously not bothered by any type of sexuality.

But to answer your questions - my agenda is to illustrate to the rest of the industry that your attitude is not only dangerous to the other performers but also to the industry as a whole.

(a) No difference between hetero, homo or transgendered sex acts
(b) At least with you it will be rather easy
(c) if you actually read my posts you would see the model releases dont matter. Concentrate on with having sex with trannies and I will handle the law.

Michael
AdultBizLaw.com



how could i deign to question the expertise of someone who is too lazy to chase ambulances so he preys on the young girls in our business who dont know any better? how altruistic of you.

so if i do one condom shemale scene every 6 months, then somehow that correlates to being a "danger" to our industry? meanwhile, half of your fucking "clients" (in more ways than one) are doing god knows when the camera isnt rolling. you sir have no credibility with me, nor anyone else in this business. i can assure you with 100 percent that you will never be litigating any case involving me, ever. i am one of the safest people in this business, and i have about 40 straight months of good AIM tests to prove it. go ahead and check the records bro. one more time....40 straight good AIM tests. so please turn your attention to getting more new girls as "clients" and leave me the hell alone. because, once again, for the millionth time...i am not going anywhere. i am still going to be working every day, sometimes twice a day, for the same companies i always work for.
_________________________
My Clips 4 Sale Store