#218249 - 01/24/0709:13 PMRe: Christians latest bareback tranny video
christianxxx
Pervert
Registered: 07/05/05
Posts: 2134
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Quote: good lord....i was at work all day and i missed like 40 posts! i guess i should address some things in order.
1. vanessa blue should be bitter, i would be too if i got fired from a company b/c she refused to use me. lol....but the bottom line is she is a bitter woman b/c lex dumped her and i already fucked her so whatever.
2. its just hard to take pornlaw seriously when he dates girls in the business and hangs out with vanessa blue. he obviously has an agenda. and pornlaw leaves out so many questions, by saying blanket statements. a. is there a difference in homosexual (girl vs. guy) in the eyes of the law? b. how can you prove that a company should have known about the past scenes of a performer? c. how do you get around signing model releases?
3. i love how random people using fake names (juan r, seeya, etc) want me to divulge personal information and "man up"......how fucking ironic is that?
4. any scene that is not AIM tested is ALWAYS condom! ALWAYS. do any of you really believe i have a death wish? do you really believe that i don't care about the other performers that i work with? i resent the implication that i am any more risky than any other performers out there. none of you say a single fucking thing about all of the girls and guys in our business who are regular IV drug users, and you all know that there are some.
4. once again, let me restate, i work for the same companies over and over and they will always use me. so if some girls wont work with me, thats fine. there will be girls that will. so you can keep bringing this crap up to your hearts desire, it only makes me more popular and gets me more work. so thank you to all the haters!
to answer your number 3 were not the ones who are putting other performers at risk you are. You not think they have the right to know?
and to the first #4 When you do a non AIM tested suit you say you always use condoms which is great. Do you retest before shooting AIM regulated shoots? Cause to my knowledge condoms are not 100% safe at the pervention of HIV. I agree with you that Id stay clear of performers who are IV drug users they like you are putting everyone at risk.
okay, so lets recap......
1. performers doing any scenes with shemales or guys (condom or non) 2. performers who are drug users 3. performers who have sex off camera with people who arent AIM tested (non condom) - (ex. hooking, escorting) 4. male performers who have sex off camera with shemales, guys with or without condoms
so....how many people do you think are left on the outside of these categories? lol....how do you guys differentiate any of these? is there an order of safety in these?