Quote:
It seems that violations that were noted were "technical" administrative issues in nature - a missing document, a missing picture, picture not close enough to the performer, a "commercial" from another source, etc.
I believe that the purpose of the law was to protect minors from being used in the films. Were any such violations found or suspected or such complaints made? Or was all they after just administrative paperwork snafus?
I dont believe any actual underage performers were found however, no one on the panel mentioned exactly what violations were there. I can only assume that the violations mentioned were technical. This is why this law is so difficult. Primary Producers can still go to jail even if everyone in the movie is 50 yrs old +.
Michael
Previous Topic
Index
