LAST COMMUNICATION BEFORE DEACTIVATION

You should give me the same courtesy as any other member of your community. I saw no requirement of being your customer to post comments.

Are you saying your etiquette is based on the amount of purchases made on your site?

I made a polite, well-written protest and you're saying that you can dismiss my concerns because you don't care for my porn collection methods??

Your rules state that if a poster had a problem with a moderator, it would be addressed if the person involved send a polite email outlining the complaint. Neither the poster of the rules nor Scipio's explanation of them in his post mentioned a minimum purchase.

The name of the site is "Adult DVD Talk" NOT "You Can Have an Opinion if You Buy Your DVDs Here".

Might I assume that a poster who expresses strong opinions not to your liking and has the ability to make them lucid and clear is classified "high maintenance"? I brings on memories of Stalin, and surely you don't mean to make such an allusion.

As far as I know this is the only problem I've had with a mod. I have had disagreements with Mia Rose, who I happen to know from elsewhere, and Kelly Wells. But, as you can see that has turned out fine.

Why so unwelcome? Why are you so suspicious of new users?

And, who says just because I live on RapidShare that I'm never going to buy a DVD again? Most of my porn is teen amateur - REAL AMATEUR - not Madison Monroe and Hailey Young called amateurs. Those are best downloaded for free.


By the way, if you've never taken Logic, you might not know that your argument is in the form of an invalid informal fallacy knows as "Ad Hominem" where one declines to address the points of the argument and instead attacks the person asking for a reply.

It is usually the resort of a person who knows that there is difficulty in making their own points, so you should refrain from its use to avoid being lumped into this category.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem

Please obey you own rules of etiquette and RESPOND to my objection in my original email NOT my porn collection preference and my strength of conviction.

As you wisely suggest on your site, please refrain from personal attacks,

RVitello