Whoremaster
Registered: 10/21/05
Posts: 2710
|
Quote:
Of course I do, Beautiful women sharing etc etc.
I HAVE talked about that Anabolic comp title before. While I like the idea of a comp dedicated to my scenes, I DON'T like the title of it. If people took the term 'whore' to mean a very sexual person or something equating to that, I wouldn't have a problem with it. But unfortunately, the people who use the term the most DON'T mean it in the same way they would call a guy a stud. They mean it to be degrading, to say that the girl they are talking about is not worth anything else.
Well, for any porn producer/director out there who believes this, those GIRLS have made you a hell of a lot of money, and if for no other reason than that, you should treat them with respect. I don't believe in trash talking to get attention. It's low, and it means that your product isn't worthy of attention on it's own. But I don't have to worry about that problem. I spend my time worrying about how to make my product even better, not trying to figure out new ways to degrade girls.
Wow...it's kind of ironic that Tricia Deveraux rails against the fact that Anabolic put out a compilation of her scenes that labels her a 'Cum Sucking Whore', yet has absolutely no qualms about distributing movies such as 'Vault Of Whores', 'Trophy Whores', 'New Whores On The Block', 'Fame Is A Whore On Butt Row', 'My Girlfriend's Whore Friend' and 'Belladonna's Butthole Whores'.
Hey, who knows, maybe Evil Angel will be releasing a movie called 'Cum Gargling Fuck Pigs' (as per Mr. Jeff Steward) in the near future? 
I would point out this obvious hypocrisy (WE may call talent 'whores', but YOU may not) on ADT, but it would just lead to me being banned from the home of free expression. Which is probably why none of the resident cadre of arselickers over there has had the balls to bring this little hypocritical oversight to Ms. Deveraux's attention. 
|