Quote:

---

Can we call girl-on-girl GAY? I doesnt feel like
it is real gay like San Francisco hairy guy kissing hairy guy gay. That is absolute vomit gay. Girl-on-Girl is soft and succulent, like imported French artsy things.

It is because they are only going into and probing
into each other's baby canal (birth canals) and
mid-wife regions, and to a guy it doesnt look as
harshly gay as a scene with two body-builders kissing
each other.

Girl-on-Girl porn is actually boring to watch.
But, sometimes it can be very hot. Case in point,
your honor, watch AMBER LYNN and JEANNA FINE
ass to ass with a long dildo between them, banging
their asses together! in a 80s video called
AMBERELLA, AGENT OF LUST, (or some title like that).
To me that was real hot scene, because I could
see their high heeled feet and nice thick asses, and
flanks of their legs, which is my visual need for
a hard-on. Yet, in many 70s classic videos (from
the classic 35 mm films), I find the long long
pussy eating scenes between two girls absolutely
boring and waste of time.

---

"baby canal (birth canals)"????? What the fuck, dude?? You watch waaaay too much Lifetime.