Quote:

---

If you really want to impress me, tell me of the Bush Conspiracy(TM) and its links to Gavrilo Princip and the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.

---

Interesting challenge. A loaded question, for sure, but interesting nonetheless.

Okay, there are, of course, no direct ties to the murder of Archduke Ferdinand and the Bush family(well, that I know of), given the time period, but many Zionist and rightwinger pundits have been drawing a comparison to murder of Ferdinand to the most recent run-up to World War 3, originating with the captured soliders in Israel.



In the first week of September 2006, David Twersky, the Tel Aviv correspondent for the New York Sun, a mouthpiece for the Israeli hardliners, compared the kidnapping of a corporal in Gaza to the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo, the incident that triggered World War I.

He, like so many right winger pundits, like Newt, Hannity and Bitch, are demanding a third World War and using the supposed capture of the soldiers in Israel as a means to that end.

The fact that millions of innocents in Iran and Syria, and America, will die doesn't bother rightwingers, and why should it? Right Wingers, as we all know, don't care about people. As Jamesn pointed in his rambling incoherent, I'm as drunk as Chico Wang on a week day, banter.


As the assassin of Ferdinand, Gavrilo Princip "the bullet that started WW1" was definitely part of a conspiracy involving officials in Montenegro, France and Serbia but in the overall, there is no direct conspiracy involving Bush and the murder of Ferdinand and Sophie.

Is it possible to trademark Bush lied and killed 3,000 Americans in the process for oil and defence contracts? Maybe, Bush Lied (TM).