This should help make the industry safer.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4608309/

20 minutes isn't enough time for PCR amplification: I wonder how they do it?

99% accuracy is actually kinda poor. Are those errors false positives or false negatives? And, are the errors random or influenced by the testee in some way (i.e. does the error rate increase, with false negatives, based on diet)?

I'm going to invent the 19 Minute HIV Test.

its not a PCR test, its an ELISA

Something about this says danger to me.....

This test is useless to us, it is designed for junkies and crack whores who will too drunk or dead in a gutter before the 2 week or 48 hour tests come back. Not a very optimistic view, I suppose.

Malice