This is a poorly thought-through scheme incidentally and ought to be rejected.

First of all, what's the problem, is this really so important it ought to be taking up time? It smacks of internal politics, not science.

Secondly, how many planets do you want? They're talking 12 off the bat, but there are 50+ objects known that meet the definition and probably 200+ total. 200 planets?
_________________________
"If they can't picture me with a knife, forcing them to strip in an alley, I don't want any part of it. It's humiliating." - windsock