At this point, my aim is to see how much her condition has deteriorated since, say, June of this year. I'm not sure it's WHAT she says, anyway, but HOW she says it. Plus, it seems only fair that she be given a chance to respond to the charges...or verdicts...of retardation, autism, etc.

No?

Plus, wouldn't it be kind of FUNNY to hear what she has to say about these opinions?

And don't get me wrong--I've seen plenty of 'tards, deviants and defects in 13 years around this industry. And I'm not in the business of defending any of them.