bullshit, you're using an ad-hoc example to support a completely environmental position on development?



even stuff like criminality is INTERACTIONAL-meaning you have to combine nurture with heritability of a certain genetic expression.

meaning antisocial behavior is partially-heritable and someone with a high value for the genetic part of the phenotypic equation will pass it on to offspring. porn actors go to jail and do drugs at an elevated rate and social determinism can't explain everything.

so their cum is full of crime.

stuff like intelligence is between 40-80% heritable-there's no getting away from that no matter how many gerald ford examples you can find.

the intelligence of the guy doing the creampie dramatically affects the potential intelligence of the kid. if john strong fathers a child, you'd STILL end up with an adult of average intelligence at best no matter how perfect an environment for learning you created. take e.o. wilson's jizz and put it in the same ideal environment and you're going to end up with a smarter kid. that simple, some sperm is more valuable than other sperm.