Quote:

Andrew Blakes' stuff are the worst. Lesbian porno is supposed to be raunchy, well all good pornos are raunchy and nasty as hell. He has way too many camera movements and cuts, he is more interested in the artform and style. Good Porn has no camera artform, It is simple, establishing shot, and then close-ups, more close-ups and hold it there, medium closeups and hold it there, Dont fucking move the camera. Leave it up to the actresses to do their nastiness and you document what they do. It is not about how cool you can whiz and zoom in and out and pan around the room, that is all bullshit...what you end up are bullshit footages of you panning and cutting around like an idiot.

Like I said, if I wanted to see a Steven Spielberg type movie I go and see Saving Private Ryan, Porn shouldn't be filmed like a Steven Spielberg movie.



Ok Ok Ok, I see your point.

I like to see it stylized. I don't mind Blakes stuff, but I understand what you are saying.

Caligula lesbian scene, Remember that scene? Remember that old school movie? http://www.caligulathemovie.com/LoveScenes.html That is an awesome Lez scene.

Can't remember the actresses, but when one is licking out the other, and she pauses looks up, and the girls juices are all over her tongue. That's a ball busting scene right there. Maybe find a balance, stylizing the scenes might get the girls really into what they are doing, outfits scenery etc. It all ups the ante on the set - then let'em loose. Film that.

What about girl juices then? Seeing a girl actually aroused, generally in Lez scenes - and seeing her juices running out. I have only seen that a few times in lez scenes. So the formula for good lez scene could be: keep the rough style filming, close ups, etc + stylized set, outfits, theme + good dominate female to submissive female actresses. Keep it raw yet styled = good Lesbian scene?