you're still wandering through shit because you looked stupid. you proudly declared 1900 dollars of torn fishing net as "collisions". semantics matter, terms need to be defined to make any progress. it's discrediting when one takes the kind of liberties you did with including "collide" with "net" when it's that far out of general usage. nobody reading this would associate the words and say " shit! i just collided with a net!" nets give way, ensnare, tangle--there's no collision there.

what you did was either careless or you assume you can pass-off data, that if carefully read would be absurdly-inflated. sure, 43 collisions looks great for you. the problem is, you've just stretched the semantical-boundries of things to the point where it's the same as writing off a hooker as a business expense.

i'm not interested in wondering about ther credibility of links on a porn-forum after the first few were either amatuerish or insulting in the assumption your reader would accept them without concern. either way, i don't argue with people who i'm going to keep on a leash with stretching data to definition because it looks the way they want.