Quote:

Slobodan was making an effective defense of Belgrade, one of Europe's oldest cities, against an Islamic horde championed by the KLA, which we have learned was rotten to its core with Jihadists and Al-Qaeda fighters.

For this reason, Slobodan was vindicated by history. Ultimately, it would have been in the best interest of the West to have sided with him, kept Belgrade European rather than Islamic, and annihilated the Jihadist-filled KLA. Instead, the West turned its weapons on its own, handed over territory to Islam, the arranged for an Adolf Eichmann showtrial for the leader who actually understood the situation.

RIP, Slobo.





So long as he was mass-murering bum-sniffers, croats, anyone who wasn't serb good right?

After Tito died he deliberately agitated for a long time for a split of Yugoslavia so he could grab land for the Serbs, who in many ways are as imperialistic as anyone.

Tens if not hundreds of thousands died, including in some of the worst massacres Europe has seen. Srebrinica for instance.

He was certainly no angel. He was one of the worst of modern times, especially in Western terms.



Justifying his life by saying "at least he killed some muslims" is doing an injustice to the tens of thousands he killed that weren't muslims, or were muslims living quiet peasant lives in the hills of Yugoslavia who didn't know how to spell Jihad, let alone serve one.



Show trial I'll agree with you on. Seeing the situation better then the west I'll agree with you. But I highly doubt controlling jihadists was too high on his list of justifications. Cleansing Kosovo for Serb glory and grabbing land was the prime reason.



PS: And as I say Serbia is traditionally aligned with the Russians anyway, so he had absolutely no interest in serving the West.
_________________________
Can someone reactivate me please. I vote my deactivation as the lamest ever. You know its right. Do it, do it do it.