Quote:

you honestly think that your website, which resembles the sparkly candy-vomit of a teenage girl, is an example of reputable journalism? that's like saying the creators of the glittery gif's on myspace are avant garde artists.

by your admission you have a lot of expendable income so that you can erase the degrees of separation between you, a small (also by your own admission) arrogant man, and some hot bitches. congratulations.

i wouldn't hesitate to say that the reason monstar's site is appealing is because of the friendly rapport between author and subject, something that you can't purchase, and something that definitely doesn't come about when you brag about the size of your wallet and how many hits you get. also, i guarantee most of your traffic is due to that hot bitch's ass you use for your incessant advertising, and not the quality of the content. here's another protip: AIM smiley's and generic questions forced upon bored stars do not make a journalist.



I have completed my job for the fact that you read the smileys. My traffic isn't due to hot ass bitches. I didn't start interview hot ass bitches until 2006. Before it was commentaries and reviews of movies. Obviously porn fans value what I say or they wouldn't read my reviews.

If Monstar's site is more appealing how come no one reads it?

I'm not a journalist or a gossip columnist. I'm a critic.
_________________________
http://www.mypornoreview.com